Intrigued by regular polyhedra for years

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Regular Years
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,830
Reaction score
7,815
I've been intrigued by regular polyhedra for years, and have oft tinkered with them.

Can someone provide the "textbook definition" of a regular polyhedron?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A "regular polyhedron" is a polyhedron, all of whose faces are regular polygons AND all of whose polyhedral angles are congruent.

If you add the requirement that they be convex (and was classically the case) then only the 5 "Platonic solids" are regular polyhedra. If you allow concave polyhedra, then there are 4 additional regular polyhedra.
 
Fantastic. I was specifically looking to find out whether convexity was a requirement.


Can you point me at some links that explore the additional 4 polyhedra?

Also, the "polyhedral angles" - are they merely the angle joining two adjacent polygons?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top