- #1
krtica
- 50
- 0
The link is an image with the question and circuit representation:
http://i49.tinypic.com/2mmwg8l.png
Here are the equations I used:
V_out/V_in = R_2/(R_1 + R_2) {using the node method}
R_thevenin (R_th) = R_2*R_1/(R_1+R_2)
And given the conditions =>
10 < R_th < 30
Manipulating this inequality I found that 50 < R_1 < 150, which left me with three possible values for R_1 (56, 68, 82).
Using the first equation, I put in the numbers, which gave me 0.2=R_2/(R_2+56) and solved for R_2 with every value I put in for R_1 (56, 68, 82).
R_2 values were 14, 17, and 20, respectively, which came to equate to 15, 18, and 22 when compared to the original set of resistors and the 10% condition.
I tried putting in the values of these resistors I used, because all gave me the right ratio of voltages, but they're incorrect.
Pardon how nuanced I may seem, it's been too long since I've done any physics..
http://i49.tinypic.com/2mmwg8l.png
Here are the equations I used:
V_out/V_in = R_2/(R_1 + R_2) {using the node method}
R_thevenin (R_th) = R_2*R_1/(R_1+R_2)
And given the conditions =>
10 < R_th < 30
Manipulating this inequality I found that 50 < R_1 < 150, which left me with three possible values for R_1 (56, 68, 82).
Using the first equation, I put in the numbers, which gave me 0.2=R_2/(R_2+56) and solved for R_2 with every value I put in for R_1 (56, 68, 82).
R_2 values were 14, 17, and 20, respectively, which came to equate to 15, 18, and 22 when compared to the original set of resistors and the 10% condition.
I tried putting in the values of these resistors I used, because all gave me the right ratio of voltages, but they're incorrect.
Pardon how nuanced I may seem, it's been too long since I've done any physics..