Introducing African American Scientists to kids in Middle School- High School

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the introduction of African American scientists to middle and high school students, focusing on how to effectively integrate their contributions into various science curricula. Participants explore the relevance of race in education and the importance of diversifying the representation of scientists in teaching materials.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest specific African American scientists and their contributions to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering, questioning how to connect these figures to relevant subjects in school.
  • Others express concern about the focus on race, arguing that it may not be necessary to highlight the race of scientists unless it is directly relevant to their contributions.
  • There are calls for a broader approach that includes scientists from various backgrounds to provide a more comprehensive view of scientific history.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of exposing students to diverse scientific contributions to combat a predominantly Western narrative in educational materials.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for emphasizing race to create division rather than unity in understanding scientific contributions.
  • Participants discuss the historical context of representation in science, noting that many scientists have historically been white men, and the implications of this on education.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether race should be emphasized in the teaching of science. There are multiple competing views regarding the importance of highlighting the contributions of African American scientists versus a more generalized approach to discussing scientists based solely on their work.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include differing interpretations of the relevance of race in science education, the historical context of scientific contributions, and the potential biases present in current educational materials.

korr2221
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
1. Dr. Meredith Gourdine for Physics- Physicist who is best known for
finding a successful method to use the principles of EGD to directly
convert gas to electricity.

2. Percy Julian for Biology- He created derivative drugs to treat
glaucoma and arthritis.

3. Lloyd A. Hall for Chemistry- Chemist Lloyd Augustus Hall is best known
for his work in the field of food technology, where he developed
processes to cure and preserve meat.

4. Elijah Mccoy- Inventor who is best known for inventing the automatic
lubricator for oiling boats and automobiles.

5. Granville T. Woods- Granville T. Woods developed variety of inventions
relating to the railroad industry such as the telegraphony.

6. Lewis Latimer- Lewis H. Latimer was an African American scientist who
is best known for the significant modifications he made to Thomas Edison's light bulb to make it longer lasting.

7. Garrett A. Morgan- He was an inventor who is best known for inventing
a device called the Morgan safety hood and smoke protector.

If you were to introduce these guys in school for certain subjects (such as biology, chemistry, physics, math and etc) to kids how would you do it? When and what course would you relate and connect these inventors to? I want to introduce them at some point but I don't know when is it best? What fundamental concepts are some of these men known for related to?
 
Science news on Phys.org
What a crazy question! So, on the one hand, race doesn't matter, but on the other, we are going to specifically mention black people. Why is this? Blacks aren't the only minority. How do you introduce every other scientist/inventor/mathematician? I would do it EXACTLY like that.
 
Robert1986 said:
What a crazy question! So, on the one hand, race doesn't matter, but on the other, we are going to specifically mention black people. Why is this? Blacks aren't the only minority. How do you introduce every other scientist/inventor/mathematician? I would do it EXACTLY like that.

My focus is on Blacks only because if I account for everyone the list would be very long. But you're right, how exactly would we do this? I think it would be great if more schools offer a history course on the progression of Science from a variety of cultures. It'll make their Science courses much more meaningful.

But my question isn't too crazy. So for example... Dr. Meredith Gourdine, if you were a High School Physics teacher when would you start connecting his work of EGD to directly convert gas to electricity?
 
korr2221 said:
My focus is on Blacks only because if I account for everyone the list would be very long.

Surely you don't meant that the only minority scientists you are going to discus are the black ones.

I would completely forget about race or nationality. Then, I would mention a scientist if he has done something that warrants a mention. THEN if the fact that he is black/Hispanic/female is relevant, mention that fact.
 
Robert1986 said:
Surely you don't meant that the only minority scientists you are going to discus are the black ones.

I would completely forget about race or nationality. Then, I would mention a scientist if he has done something that warrants a mention. THEN if the fact that he is black/Hispanic/female is relevant, mention that fact.

Of course. But for this topic they are. It's just something I wanted to ask people planning for black history month next year.

You're right one should completely forget about race and nationality. But one would also want to diversify and expose the younger generation about science in multiple aspects. If you open a textbook today the majority of the texts are dominated by Western Civilization's views. I find it important to expose them to as many facets of science as possible.
 
korr2221 said:
If you open a textbook today the majority of the texts are dominated by Western Civilization's views.

Well, there's a rather good reason for this: The US is a Western Civilization.

As for science, there is also a good reason that most of the scientists discussed are white men. It is because most of the scientists are white men (at least historically, I don't know what the demographics are now.) Of course, there are many disturbing reasons that this is the case, but it is a fact.

But, like I said, just bring the black scientists up when you are teaching about whatever topic they worked in. Then, if you want, say something like "Oh, this guy was black, which meant he had to overcome these difficulties: X, Y, Z, etc"
 
korr2221 said:
You're right one should completely forget about race and nationality. But one would also want to diversify and expose the younger generation about science in multiple aspects. If you open a textbook today the majority of the texts are dominated by Western Civilization's views. I find it important to expose them to as many facets of science as possible.

What do you mean "Western Civilization's views"? There are no "views" in science. There are only facts.
 
Pengwuino said:
What do you mean "Western Civilization's views"? There are no "views" in science. There are only facts.

The science are facts but this isn't always true with the history of science. We base our history only on written works and evidence. When the evidence is destroyed it is hard to really say.
 
Robert1986 said:
Well, there's a rather good reason for this: The US is a Western Civilization.

As for science, there is also a good reason that most of the scientists discussed are white men. It is because most of the scientists are white men (at least historically, I don't know what the demographics are now.) Of course, there are many disturbing reasons that this is the case, but it is a fact.

But, like I said, just bring the black scientists up when you are teaching about whatever topic they worked in. Then, if you want, say something like "Oh, this guy was black, which meant he had to overcome these difficulties: X, Y, Z, etc"

Right. But we are also a country of many cultures. It won't do us any good if we don't expose them to Non-Western aspects of Science too. For a minority kid who sees only white men making contributions towards Science he'll eventually will wonder about the one's that are not. Why not expose it to them while they are young?

It really depends on how you interpreted what a Scientist is. There's been thousands of men other than white men who has made remarkable discoveries that has contributed to Science too.

I am not bringing up a Scientist in class just because of their color. I am just trying to incorporate Scientists of all cultures. It just happens the ones I've asked opinions on how to link them with the lessons is because the school wants teachers to incorporate that group into the lessons and I wanted to see how some would approach this.
 
  • #10
In my opinion that causes even more divide than it helps quell the relations between people who still view others in terms of "race", and it doesn't stop people from seeing only the surface of the person. A lesson should only incorporate relevant material, and on the off-times, incorporate interesting facts.
Even if the scientist was black, noting his/her skin-color is not exactly beneficial as I see it as more degrading to the point of, "here this scientist did x and y, oh but wait! he is black as well!", that doesn't seem like something relevant in the science curriculum. Not only irrelevant, other scientists usually in the western world (text wise) are noted based on nationality, i.e. American, European, etc..., so simply saying it's black is something more disparaging and tips the line of the "us vs. them" mentality.

Rarely do we discuss the aspects of other scientists phenotype within course-work, but just the scientists work itself. To mention race only stifles progression in the human relations department. I know you mean well, but that isn't the way to go about it.

I am just trying to incorporate Scientists of all cultures.

Aren't those scientists American (Granville being Canadian-American)? Weren't they westernized-American people as well? Saying they are of a different culture isn't exactly correct. Yes, they aren't white, but being white isn't a requisite to being of American culture.
 
  • #11
I suggest you give an even handed and accurate representation of the history of scientific advancement.

Anything else comes off as an attempt to promote a social agenda which I think has no place in the education system although it's pretty clear those who control it disagree with this position.
 
  • #12
korr2221 said:
1. Dr. Meredith Gourdine for Physics- Physicist who is best known for finding a successful method to use the principles of EGD to directly
convert gas to electricity.

2. Percy Julian for Biology- He created derivative drugs to treat glaucoma and arthritis.

3. Lloyd A. Hall for Chemistry- Chemist Lloyd Augustus Hall is best known for his work in the field of food technology, where he developed processes to cure and preserve meat.

4. Elijah Mccoy- Inventor who is best known for inventing the automatic lubricator for oiling boats and automobiles.

5. Granville T. Woods- Granville T. Woods developed variety of inventions relating to the railroad industry such as the telegraphony.

6. Lewis Latimer- Lewis H. Latimer was an African American scientist who is best known for the significant modifications he made to Thomas Edison's light bulb to make it longer lasting.

7. Garrett A. Morgan- He was an inventor who is best known for inventing a device called the Morgan safety hood and smoke protector.

If you were to introduce these guys in school for certain subjects (such as biology, chemistry, physics, math and etc) to kids how would you do it? When and what course would you relate and connect these inventors to? I want to introduce them at some point but I don't know when is it best? What fundamental concepts are some of these men known for related to?
It's probably best to introduce them as early as possible, e.g., in 4th grade. Otherwise, their particular achievements could be introduced in respective courses, e.g., biology, chemistry, physics or a general science course.

Let's not forget George Washington Carver. He made quite an impression on me when I was very young. He was one my earliest scientific heros.

Here's a good resource http://books.google.com/books?id=W0nw5KTJJygC&lpg=PA1&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false
 
Last edited:
  • #13
korr2221 said:
… If you were to introduce these guys in school for certain subjects (such as biology, chemistry, physics, math and etc) to kids how would you do it? When and what course would you relate and connect these inventors to? I want to introduce them at some point but I don't know when is it best? What fundamental concepts are some of these men known for related to?
korr2221 said:
… I wanted to ask people planning for black history month next year.
korr2221 said:
… the school wants teachers to incorporate that group into the lessons and I wanted to see how some would approach this.

so the school has given you a list?

i'm wondering, which side are they on? :redface:

any kid bright enough to be a scientist is bright enough to see that this is a list of very minor contributions

until recently, it has been almost impossible for a black person/person of colour/african american to become a scientist

are you using this list to try to prove that black people can be just as good scientists as white people?

it makes much more sense to start from that premise (as being blindingly obvious), and use the list to demonstrate how disadvantaged black people were (and perhaps still are)​

and maybe ask the class "can you become famous scientists?" in expectation of the reply "yes we can!" :smile:

(but if you must do it the other way, at least choose a more appealing list … perhaps using a selection from the book Astronuc referred to … http://books.google.com/books?id=W0nw5KTJJygC&lpg=PA1&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false …

i'd go for black astronauts and astronomers, to a background poster of Michael Jackson moonwalking!)
 
  • #14
korr2221 said:
<snip>
You're right one should completely forget about race and nationality. But one would also want to diversify and expose the younger generation about science in multiple aspects. <snip>

I hear you, and think you are right for raising this point. I think you've motivated me to approach our College of Urban Affairs and open a discussion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K