Introducing LaTeX Math Typesetting

[BLUE_CHIP]

T_{r}=10.8-8.1
T_{r}=2.7
T_{r}
T_{v}
T_{r}=T_{v}
T_{r}^{2}\propto{I}

 

[jasonc65]

\langle p_1 | p_2 \rangle = \langle 0 | a(p_1) a^{\dagger} (p_2) | 0 \rangle = \delta (p_1 - p_2)
\langle x^1 | x^2 \rangle = \langle 0 | \varphi (x^1) \varphi ^{\dagger} (x^2) | 0 \rangle = \delta (x^1 - x^2)
T^{\mu \nu} = g^{\nu \sigma} {T^{\mu}}_{\sigma}

 

[rsixtyone]

Testing LaTex

This is just a test to see if it works.


A=[A\angle\theta_{A}]

 

[phreak]

\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{n+1}

 

[Raza]

2 Li_(_s_) + 2 H_2O_(_l_) \xrightarrow~2 LiOH_(_a_q_) + H_2_(_g_)
2 K_(_s_) + 2 H_2O_(_l_) \xrightarrow~2 KOH_(_a_q_) + H_2_(_g_)
Ca_(_s_) + 2 H_2O_(_l_) \xrightarrow~Ca(OH)_2_(_s_) + H_2_(_g_)
Na_(_s_) + 2 H_2O_(_l_) \xrightarrow~2 NaOH_(_a_q_) + H_2_(_g_)
Mg_(_s_) + 2 H_2O_(_g_) \xrightarrow~Mg(OH)_2_(_s_) + H_2_(_g_)
2 Al_(_s_) + 6 H_2O_(_g_) \xrightarrow~2 Al(OH)_3_(_s_) + 3 H_2_(_g_)
Fe_(_s_) + CuSO_4_(_a_q_) \xrightarrow~FeSO_4_(_a_q_) + Cu_(_s_)\xleftarrow~

 

[rachmaninoff]

\Gamma(z)=\int^{\infty}_0t^{z-1}e^{-t}dt

 

[Kea]

test

Let me try

\xymatrix @=15mm {T \hspace{2mm} \ar@{&gt;-&gt;}[r]_{f}<br /> \ar[d]^{!} &amp; S \ar[d]_{\chi} \\ \{ \ast \} \ar[r]^{t} &amp; \{ 0,1 \}<br /> }

Oops. Can we have the xy package at some future date?

Cheers
Kea

 

[rachmaninoff]

Test:

(AB)C=([a_{ij}]\times[b_{ij}])\times[c_{ij}]=[\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{ik}b_{kj}]\times[c_{ij}]=[\sum_{l=1}^{p}(\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{ik}b_{kl})c_{lj}]=[\sum_{l=1}^{p}(\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{ik}b_{kl}c_{lj})]
=[\sum_{k=1}^{n}(\sum_{l=1}^{p}a_{ik}b_{kl}c_{lj})]=[\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{ik}(\sum_{l=1}^{p}b_{kl}c_{lj})]=[a_{ik}]\times[\sum_{l=1}^{p}b_{kl}c_{lj}]=[a_{ik}]\times([b_{ik}]\times[c_{ik}])=A(BC)

 

[marcus]

a test
\not G

how do you put a slash thru a letter? anybody?
I just want a distinguished G, slash isn't so good, so I will try some others

\widehat{G}

\tilde{G}

\overline{G}

\mathbb{G}

 

[marcus]

I see Ambitwistor has made some slashes but it seems very involved so maybe let's forget about it and try something else

<br /> \def\pds{\kern+0.1em /\kern-0.55em \partial}<br /> \def\lts#1{\kern+0.1em /\kern-0.65em #1}<br /> {\cal L}_R = \sum_{i=1}^G<br /> \bar{E}^i_R(i\pds<br /> - g_1Y_E \lts{B})E^i_R +<br /> \bar{D}^i_R(i\lts{D}<br /> - g_1Y_D \lts{B})D^i_R +<br /> \bar{U}^i_R(i\lts{D}<br /> - g_1Y_U \lts{B})U^i_R)<br />

There's actually a whole 'slashed' package for this...

I want a distinguished G symbol. I'll try some more alternatives

\mathcal{G}

\mathbb{G}

\mathbf{G}

\mathsf{G}

 

[JesseM]

How come I when I try to edit my code, the changes don't show up in the post? In this post I wanted to change that \frac{dx}{d\tau} in the second line of the Brian Greene quote into dx/d\tau, so I changed the code in the edit window, but it still shows up like the first version on my screen.

edit: I checked back a few hours later, and now the edited version appears onscreen. But then I made another edit, and again the graphics were not updated, even if I hit "refresh" or quit my browser and returned to the page. Is there a delay in how quickly LaTeX graphics are updated or something?

edit 2: never mind, I figured out that if I clear my browser's disk cache before hitting "refresh", the graphic gets updated correctly, so that must have been the problem.

 

[clive]

a^n


I would like to write equations too...am I missing something?

 

[chroot]

clive:

Be careful. You need a a forward slash, not a backslash, in your closing [ tex ] tags.

Type this, but omit the spaces:

[ tex ] a^n [ /tex ]

- Warren

 

[Gokul43201]

I've wondered about slashes too...especially for symbols representing "not equal" (which can be got around), "not congruent" (need a slash through \equiv), "not divisible by" (or "does not divide" which is a slash across a vertical line).

Do these symbols exist (haven't seen them in any library, but I haven't looked carefully) or does it take some trick to generate them ?

 

[Gokul43201]

<br /> \def\lts#1{\kern+0.1em /\kern-0.65em #1}<br /> \lts{\equiv}~~~ \lts{=}~~~\lts{~|}~~~\lts{\vert}

Hmmm...That didn't work too well. Can I change the position of the slash ?

 

[clive]

Thanks chroot,

\bigtriangledown ^2 \phi=\sqrt{t^2+1}

What a wonderful world...

 

[Gary King]

This is very cool How can I put this new addition on my vBulletin forums as well?

Thanks in advance!

 

[Janitor]

Ten forward gears and a Georgia Overdrive

Let's see...

\pi * e \oint D^4 f \bigwedge F(\overline {\tau}) \approx \underbar {X}, whence

G_i \oplus G_j = \emptyset \bigcap \ker(\alpha) \longleftrightarrow \sigma ^i^j \in SU(4).

 

[HawkeyeCoug]

Latex for Statistical Mechanics

I am trying to do a formula sheet for statistical mechanics. Our professor uses a dashed-d to represent a perfect differential, which I have had trouble making. I did overwrite a d with a ^{\smallsetminus}, but the construct I was using (copied from a website) caused problems. Anyone have a non-problematic overtype?

Also, his notation is to use a line at the end of a derivative with subscripts representing the variables held constant. I can't get |, \vert, \right|, or \mid to work correctly. Has anyone solved this?

Thanks so much for your help in advance.

 

[The Divine Zephyr]

\int_{1}^{\sqrt[3]{3}}z^2dz \times \cos{\frac{3\pi}{9}}=\ln{\sqrt[3]{e}}

Integral z squared dz
from 1 to the cube root of 3
times the cosine of 3 pi over 9
equals the log of the cubes root of e


Whoever thought that up was a really clever math poet ;)

 

[ReyChiquito]

quick q.

instead of having something like this

\int_{\|\vec{X}-\vec{Y}\|=\epsilon}

can i make the \|\vec{X}-\vec{Y}\|=\epsilon} right beneath the \int sign?

the same here, instead of

\nabla_X

i want the X beneath the nabla sign

thx :)

 

[z-component]

This is very cool How can I put this new addition on my vBulletin forums as well?

Thanks in advance!

Gary, this addition is not a standard addon for vBulletin. The administrators have added the LaTeX system themselves. More information on LaTeX, http://www.latex-project.org.

 

[The Divine Zephyr]

\int \frac{3}{4+3x^2}dx=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{3}\arctan(\frac{x\sqrt{3}}{2})+C

 

[quantumdude]

Question:

Is it possible to make Venn Diagrams with LaTeX?

 

[Janus]

Question:

Is it possible to make Venn Diagrams with LaTeX?

Yep, you can use the picture environment, like thus:

<br /> \begin{picture}(400,400)<br /> <br /> \put(80,80){\circle{40}}<br /> \put(100,80){\circle{40}}<br /> \put(90,100){\circle{40}}<br /> \put(65,70){A}<br /> \put(105,70){B}<br /> \put(85,105){C}<br /> \end{picture}<br />

Though the "oval" might be more versatile:

<br /> <br /> \begin{picture}(500,500)<br /> <br /> \put(290,260){\oval(100,100)}<br /> \put(330,280){\oval(100,100)}<br /> \put(280,310){\oval(100,100)}<br /> \put(260,240){A}<br /> \put(350,240){B}<br /> \put(260,330){C}<br /> \end{picture}<br />

 

[ReyChiquito]

\int \atop \|\vec{X}-\vec{Y}\|=\epsilon

\nabla \atop X

there has to be a better way

 

[arildno]

\int \atop \|\vec{X}-\vec{Y}\|=\epsilon

\nabla \atop X

there has to be a better way

You have the "stackrel" option
\stackrel{\nabla}{X}

 

[ReyChiquito]

thx mate... I am still not convinced though... ill get it right someday :)

 

[Norman]

anyone know how to do a contraction symbol from QFT (as in Wicks Theorem)? It is basically a square brace on top of the charecters connecting 2 charecters that are not necesarily next to each other?

 

[ReyChiquito]

\iint\limits_\Omega

\int\limits_{\|\vec{X}-\vec{Y}\|=\epsilon}

\mathop{\nabla}\limits_X

all right!