Introduction to Group Theory - Abstract Algebra

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that if (ab)² = a²b² in a group G, then ab = ba. Participants clarify the steps in the proof, emphasizing the use of group properties like associativity and the existence of inverses. There is a correction regarding the uniqueness of inverses, with one participant noting a typo in the original statement. The proof is validated, but it is suggested that justifying the use of associativity may be necessary depending on the instructor's expectations. The conversation highlights the importance of precision in mathematical communication and the logical flow of proofs in group theory.
descendency
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that if (ab)2 = a2b2 in a group G, then ab = ba.

Homework Equations


* For each element a in G, there is an element b in G (called the inverse of a) such that ab = ba = e (the identity).
* For each element in G, there is a unique element b in G such that ab = ba = e.
* The operation (under which the group is defined) is associative; that is, (ab)c = a(bc).

The Attempt at a Solution


(ab)^{2} = (a)^{2}(b)^{2}
(a)^{-1}(ab)^{2}(b)^{-1} = (a)^{-1}(a)^{2}(b)^{2}(b)^{-1}
(a)^{-1}abab(b)^{-1} = (a)^{-1}aabb(b)^{-1}
ebae = eabe
ba = ab.

Is this allowed? (Keep in mind, the operation which the group is defined over is not necessarily multiplication. it may be composition.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure is but your pre last line should be ba = ab I believe.

Also your 2nd "given" is the same as your first, you probably meant something else?
 
NoMoreExams said:
Sure is but your pre last line should be ba = ab I believe.

Also your 2nd "given" is the same as your first, you probably meant something else?

The second given is the uniqueness statement. The first given is the rule that an element in a group has at least an inverse (not necessarily unique). I said "the" when I meant "an".

edit: Thanks for correcting my mistake. It's a typo. I had it right on paper, I just didn't type out what I wrote down for some reason. . .
 
Last edited:
Then that seems redundant, line 2 is stronger than line 1.
 
descendency said:

The Attempt at a Solution


(ab)^{2} = (a)^{2}(b)^{2}
(a)^{-1}(ab)^{2}(b)^{-1} = (a)^{-1}(a)^{2}(b)^{2}(b)^{-1}
(a)^{-1}abab(b)^{-1} = (a)^{-1}aabb(b)^{-1}
ebae = eabe
ba = ab.
Is this allowed?
Your work is fine, where I read it as (line 1) => (line 2) => ... .

However, depending on the level of pendency of your instructor you may be required to justify your use of associativity. E.g., the left-hand side is (ab)^2 = (ab)(ab) = a(b(ab)) = a((ba)b), and the right-hand side is a^2b^2 = (aa)(bb) = a(a(bb)) = a((ab)b); then multiply both sides on the left by a^{-1}, and so on.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
840
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
9K