Intuition Behind Scale Invariance Power Spectrum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the concept of scale invariance in the context of the scale invariant power spectrum as defined in "Statistical Physics for Cosmic Structures." It emphasizes that the normalized mass variance over a sphere of radius equal to the horizon distance, ##R_H(t)##, remains constant over time. This implies that mass variance calculated at different times, ##t_0## and ##t_1##, yields the same result despite variations in horizon distance. The requirement for scale invariance is specifically valid under de Sitter expansion conditions, where the density remains constant over time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of scale invariance in cosmology
  • Familiarity with the concept of the horizon distance, ##R_H(t)##
  • Knowledge of mass variance and its calculation
  • Basic principles of de Sitter expansion in cosmological models
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of scale invariance in cosmological perturbation theory
  • Study the mathematical derivation of the scale invariant power spectrum
  • Investigate the properties of de Sitter space and its relevance to cosmology
  • Learn about the role of density perturbations in the evolution of cosmic structures
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physicists interested in the theoretical foundations of cosmic structure formation and the implications of scale invariance in cosmological models.

center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
In the book "Statistical physics for cosmic structures" at p. 171 a read a definition of scale invariance (leading to the so called scale invariant power spectrum) given as the requirement that ##\sigma^2_M(R=R_H(t)) = constant##, where ##R_H(t)## is the horizon, i.e. the maximal distance that light could have traveled in cosmological time ##t##.

In other words, the normalised mass variance over a sphere of radius the horizon distance should be independent of time. So if we computed the mass variance at some time ##t_0## when the horizon was ##R_H(t_0)## this should be the same as if we computed it at any other ##t_1## when the horizon was ##R_H(t_1)## even though ##R_H(t_0)## might be much smaller than ##R_H(t_1)##.

I am trying to get intuition for why one would believe such a requirement to be true. Does anyone have some enlightening explanations/insights?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Scale invariance is only true for de Sitter expansion in which \dot{\rho} = 0. The background is steady state, so there are no time-dependent dynamics that would impart a scale dependence on the perturbations.
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K