Intuition Mismatch: Reconciling ΔH for Ideal Gas Isothermal Expansion

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter apb000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intuition
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the change in enthalpy (ΔH) during the isothermal expansion of an ideal gas, particularly addressing the apparent contradiction between the mathematical assertion that ΔH=0 and the physical implications of heat transfer during the process. Participants explore the implications of system boundaries, heat flow, and the conditions under which ΔH is defined.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that while ΔH=0 for isothermal expansion is mathematically established, it seems contradictory when considering heat transfer into the system to maintain constant temperature.
  • Another participant suggests that the confusion arises from defining the system boundaries, indicating that the system could be the cylinder alone or the cylinder plus the heat bath.
  • A participant questions whether ΔH=0 applies only to isolated systems, proposing that for closed but not isolated systems, ΔH may not equal zero.
  • One participant highlights a potential paradox regarding constant pressure, arguing that if the volume increases during expansion, the pressure must decrease, complicating the application of ΔH=qP.
  • Another participant agrees that the assumption of constant pressure may not hold true during the expansion, leading to the conclusion that ΔH does not equal qP in this scenario.
  • Several participants engage in clarifying that ΔH=0 can still hold true despite heat flow across the cylinder, emphasizing the need to reconcile these concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of system boundaries and the conditions under which ΔH=0 applies. There is no consensus on whether ΔH can be equated to heat flow in this context, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the relationship between enthalpy change and heat transfer during isothermal expansion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their reasoning related to assumptions about system isolation, the definition of constant pressure during expansion, and the implications of heat transfer on enthalpy change.

apb000
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This is probably a trivial problem, but I can't get it straight. It's well known and easy enough to show mathematically that the change in enthalpy for the reversible isothermal expansion of an ideal gas is always zero, ΔH=0. But it's also true that the enthalpy change for a process at constant P is equal to the heat that enters (or leaves) the system, ΔH=qP. Fine.
So if I take a cylinder with a piston and place it in a heat bath, and pull the piston out in a slow, reversible fashion, I can allow that the temperature remains constant and the process is isothermal; it follows that ΔH = 0. Um...but didn't heat cross the boundary of the system? In fact doesn't it HAVE to, to keep the temperature constant? The whole process was expansion against a constant Pressure, so ΔH should equal the heat that entered the cylinder, a quantity definitely not zero.
It seems to me that with ΔT=0 the internal energy is not changing, so q=-w, and here w=P dV. Again, this is a non-zero quantity.
How do I reconcile this?
(Note: Please don't derive for me that ΔH=0 from the ideal gas law. I know, and I'm convinced. But that doesn't explain why the reasoning with the cylinder is wrong.)
 
Science news on Phys.org
Short version: The heat bath cools down.

You're splitting up the problem differently in each case. The "system" is either the cylinder OR the cylinder and the heat bath. If you expand the cylinder but bring heat in from outside, you have to account for the heat LOST outside before you get to a zero-sum.
 
That sounds like it might be the right track to me. Can I get a slightly longer version? I'm taking the system to be just the gas, which I am free to do, and the above reasoning still applies. It sounds like you're saying the solution is that ΔH=0 for an isothermal expansion ONLY if the system is isolated, not merely closed. Is this correct? I've been over the several sources that derive this statement and none of them come right out and say that. Am I right in gleaning that for a closed but not isolated system, ΔH=∫CPdT, and not zero? This is the only thing that makes intuitive sense to me.
But wait. If the system is isolated, that makes it an adiabatic expansion, not an isothermal one. So which one does ΔH=0 apply to?
This is such a simple physical problem, I'm surprised no one has been able to connect the pieces to the theory in a straightforward way.
 
Last edited:
The paradox, if I've got it right (and I probably haven't), is dependent on the pressure being constant:

"But it's also true that the enthalpy change for a process at constant P is equal to the heat that enters (or leaves) the system, ΔH=qP."

But I can't see how the pressure CAN be constant for the isothermal expansion you describe. Surely, at constant temperature, if V goes up, p must go down?
 
Okay, I think the issue is that I'm imagining the expansion is against a constant pressure, which is perfectly reasonably physically, but the pressure in the gas will not be constant. So I can't take the enthalpy to be equal to the heat flow. Simply, ΔH ≠qP in this situation, and ΔH = 0 even though the there is heat flow across the cylinder.
Is that right?
 
That's my reading of it. ΔT = 0 and Δ(PV) = 0, so ΔH = 0.
 
Okay that makes sense. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K