Complaint Was Locking the Thread on Orion1 Invalid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Orion1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Locking the Orion1 thread after just four hours was deemed invalid due to several factors. The PF Science Advisers involved were still active members and had not violated any forum rules. The short duration did not allow adequate time for responses from either forum members or advisers. Additionally, the thread represented advanced research that had been in development for two years, warranting further discussion. No valid justification or demerit was provided by the individual who locked the thread.
Orion1
Messages
961
Reaction score
3

It is my opinion that locking the thread listed in reference after 4 hours of posting to it was not valid.

1. The PF Science Advisers that were reviewing my work are still active PF members.
2. The work does not violate any PF forums rules.
3. The thread was in compliance with the advice from the PF Science Advisers.
4. 4 hours in not sufficient time for PF forum members to respond.
5. 4 hours in not sufficient time for PF Science Advisers to respond.
6. PF Science Advisers do not have time to respond to every PF posting.
7. PF forum members were not given the chance to post a response.
8. PF forum members do not have time to respond to every PF posting.
9. The thread was advanced research based and in development for two years.
10. No valid response or solution was given by the thread locker.
11. No demerit was issued by the thread locker, or a reason for a demerit.

[/Color]
Reference:
a solar model - Orion1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"This thread has turned into one person talking to himself." by Vanadium 50.

And it seems it had.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
4
Replies
163
Views
20K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top