Invariant and covariant in special relativity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of invariance and covariance in the context of special relativity. Participants explore the definitions, implications, and examples of these terms, focusing on their mathematical and physical interpretations across different inertial reference frames.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a physical quantity is invariant if it has the same magnitude in all inertial reference frames, while an expression is covariant if it maintains the same algebraic structure across these frames.
  • One participant references a book that supports the initial definitions but expresses confusion over the term "rr-cctt."
  • Another participant suggests that the expression xx+yy+zz-cctt=x'x'+y'y'+z'z'-cct't' serves as an example of a covariant expression, while also noting that the quantity s^2 is invariant.
  • It is mentioned that covariant objects, such as vectors and tensors, transform according to specific rules, and that all scalar tensors are invariant.
  • Participants discuss the term "covariant" as applicable to equations, with references to Lorentz covariance and its historical context in invariant theory.
  • One participant elaborates on the distinction between covariant and contravariant vectors, explaining how their components transform under coordinate changes.
  • Another participant highlights that the term "covariant" has multiple meanings in relativity, including its use in different contexts, such as in Lanczos's work.
  • There is a suggestion that the terminology can be confusing, with some authors mixing the usage of invariant and covariant terms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various interpretations of invariance and covariance, with some agreeing on definitions while others highlight discrepancies and nuances in usage. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise meanings and applications of these terms.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the definitions and implications of invariance and covariance depend on the context and may vary across different texts and authors. There is also mention of historical developments in the terminology that may influence current understanding.

bernhard.rothenstein
Messages
988
Reaction score
1
In anglo-american literature
-a physical quantity is invariant if it has the same magnitude in all inertial reference frame,
-an expression relating more physical quantities is covariant if it has the same algebraic structure in all inertial reference frames (rr-cctt) ?
Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One book I have sitting next to me(Introduction to the Relativity Principle; Gabriel Barton, Wiley) agrees with that.

(But I don't know what you mean by that "rr-cctt") :)
 
invariant covariant

neutrino said:
One book I have sitting next to me(Introduction to the Relativity Principle; Gabriel Barton, Wiley) agrees with that.

(But I don't know what you mean by that "rr-cctt") :)
Thanks. xx+yy+zz-cctt=x'x'+y'y'+z'z'-cct't' an example of covariant expression?
 
bernhard.rothenstein said:
xx+yy+zz-cctt=x'x'+y'y'+z'z'-cct't' an example of covariant expression?
Oh, that! I guess it is. But the quantity s^2 is invariant.
 
bernhard.rothenstein said:
In anglo-american literature
-a physical quantity is invariant if it has the same magnitude in all inertial reference frame,
-an expression relating more physical quantities is covariant if it has the same algebraic structure in all inertial reference frames (rr-cctt) ?
Thanks in advance

I believe both your assertions are correct. However, the example of a covariant structure you give is in fact an invariant. A covariant object would be

[tex][ct, x, y, z][/itex]<br /> <br /> since it transforms as a vector should. Another would be the EM field tensor, the Ricci tensor, etc. Essentially, all tensors are covariant, and all scalar tensors have the additional property that they are invariant.<br /> <br /> Note also, that some authors mix their usage of both terms (although I can't think of an example right now).[/tex]
 
The term covariant can also apply to equations. See the Wikipedia article on Lorentz covariance which I feel describes it well (since I wrote most of it).
 
A bit of background

It might help to point out that this terminology derives from invariant theory, which was a subject known to all mathematicians and physicists in the late nineteenth century, but less well known now (although it has been becoming popular again over the past decade).
 
Invariant quantity means 'has the same value in different coordinate systems'. Presumably, there is a definition how to calculate the quantity in different coordinate systems.

'Covariant equation' means 'has the same structure/form in different coordinate systems'. Sometimes they say the equation is 'form invariant' which is much clearer in my opinion.

Sometimes they say two quantities 'transform covariantly' when one changes coordinates. That simly means, the components of the quantities transform with the same matrices under change of coordinates.
An example of that is the older usage of 'covariant vector' and 'contravariant vector' :
'Covariant vector' has components 'transforming between two different coordinate systems just like a differential transforms under change of variables'. 'Co' means 'in the same way'. In modern usage covariant vectors are called one-forms or tensors of type (0,1) with one lower index.
'Contravariant vector' has components 'transforming opposite to the differential'. 'Contra' means opposition. In modern usage contravariant vectors are simply called vectors or tensors of type (1,0) with one upper index.

In GR, ds^2 is defined in any coordinate system through the metric and has the same value hence is invariant. The equation ds^2=xx+yy+zz-cctt is covariant/form-invariant with respect to inertial coordinate systems because it looks the same in the old and new inertial coordinates.
 
Last edited:
smallphi said:
Covariant means 'has the same structure/form in different coordinate systems'. An equation can be covariant if it looks the same in the old and the new coordinates.
The term "covariant" has multiple meanings in relativity. One means that the form of the equations of physics and the value of the constants in the equations, remain unchanged upon a change in coordinate. Another use that I see is in Lanczos book The Variational Principles of Mechanics. In this book Lanczos uses it in one sense to mean the following: A number is covariant if it changes with a change in coordinate system. This is how Lanczos uses the term in his book "Variational Principles of Mechanics." On page 20
For example, an invariant differential form of the first order

dw = F1 dx1 + F2 dx2 + ... Fn dx2

defines a vector. The quantities F1 , F1 , F2 ,..., Fn are the "components" of the vector: They change with coordinate system and are therefore "covariant": quanties. The whole differential form, however, is an invariant.
In Chapter-IX Classical Mechanics, page 292, Lanczos goes on to say
These equations show that the time t ceases to be an absolute quantity ... The time t has changed from an invariant quantity to a covariant quantity, whereas the speed of light c has changed from a covariant quantity to an invariant quantity.
There is a very good explanation in a footnote in Gravitation and Spacetime - Second Ed., Ohanian and Ruffini which reads in a footnote on the bottom of 371
We have "covariant" vectors, "covariant derivatives" and now "covariant equations". The word "covariant" is unfortunately much overworked, and which of the three meanings is intended must be guessed from context.

Best regards

Pete
 
Last edited:
  • #10
smallphi said:
Invariant quantity means 'has the same value in different coordinate systems'. Presumably, there is a definition how to calculate the quantity in different coordinate systems.

'Covariant equation' means 'has the same structure/form in different coordinate systems'. Sometimes they say the equation is 'form invariant' which is much clearer in my opinion.

Well done!

Covariance means "form invariance".
Covariant object is an object with well defined transformation law; scalars, vectors, spinors, and higher rank tensors.
Some quantities (tensors of certain rank) retain the same value in all coordinate systems, such quantites are called scalars or invariant.

regards


sam
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 144 ·
5
Replies
144
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K