Invariant Mass/Inelastic Collision Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving the annihilation of two particles of equal mass m, resulting in the creation of a single particle of mass M, where M > 2m. The key equations involve energy conservation and invariant mass, with the challenge being to determine the minimum total energy E of the moving particle. Participants express confusion over conservation laws and reference frames, particularly regarding momentum and energy calculations. A proposed solution arrives at an expression for total energy, but participants note discrepancies and seek a more straightforward method for solving similar problems. The conversation highlights the complexity of particle interactions and the importance of correctly applying conservation principles.
demoncore
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose two "small" particles of equal mass m collide, annihilate each other, and create another particle of mass M > 2m . (Note that the final state is just that one "big" particle, nothing else.) If one of the small particles is initially at rest, what must be the minimum total energy E of the other? Give your final result in terms of m and M.

Homework Equations



The problem also asks me to set c=1.

Invariant mass: (m)^2 = E^2 - p^2

Energy conservation:

E_initial = 2m + E_k,m = E_final = M + E_k,M

momentum conservation:

p_initial = p_final

The Attempt at a Solution



I've been wrestling with this problem in a lot of different ways (studying for finals), but cannot get the posted answer. I am confused about which quantities are conserved, since it seems there is no reference frame where all the particles are at rest. I'm not sure what values to equate in the energy four-vector. Here is one try, where I take the final momentum to be zero:

Energy conservation:

2m + E_k,m = M

=> E_k,m = M - 2m

momentum:

p_initial = p_final = 0

Invariant mass:

(m)^2 = E^2 - p^2
=> (2m +E_k,m)^2 - 0 = M^2 - 0
=> 4m^2 + 4mE_k,m + E_k,m = M^2

Already, I can tell that I've done something wrong. I also think that I'm solving for the wrong value here, since I don't have any idea of how to get the energy of the one 'moving' particle from E_k,m.

I chose this (center of mass?) frame because I can't think of any other way to write the momenta of the particles in terms of the kinetic energies without doing Lorentz gymnastics that don't seem at all appropriate to the problem. Since it doesn't seem to help me, I think I must be misunderstanding the situation in some serious way, if not completely misapplying these principles.

Thanks,
A.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
demoncore said:
I take the final momentum to be zero:
Surely you can only do that if you take a reference frame in which the initial total momentum is zero. And having obtained an answer, you'd need to calculate the answer for the given reference frame (in which one particle was initially at rest).
So why not just stick with the given frame? What is the initial total momentum in that frame? What, then, is the momentum of the resulting particle, and thus what is its total energy?
 
Well, this is what i tried:

p_initial^2 = (2m + E_k,m)^2 - 4m^2 = E_k,m^2 + 2mE_k,m = p_final^2

=> E,M,tot^2 = E_k,m^2 + 2mE_k,m + M^2 = (M +E_k,M)^2 = M^2 + 2ME_k,M + E_k,M^2

=> E_k,m^2 + 2mE_k,m = E_k,M^2 + 2ME_k,M

E_initial = 2m + E_k,m = E_final = M + E_k,M
=> E_k,M = (2m - M) + E_k,m

=> E_k,m^2 + 2mE_k,m = ((2m - M) + E_k,m)^2 + 2M((2m - M) + E_k,m)
= (2m-M)^2 + 2(2m -M)E_k,m + E_k,m^2 + 2M(2m - M) + 2ME_k,m

=> 2mE_k,m = (2m-M)^2 + 2(2m -M)E_k,m + 2M(2m - M) + 2ME_k,m
= (2m-M)(2m-M + 2E_k,m + 2M) + 2ME_k,m
= (2m-M)((2m + M) + 2E_k,m) + 2ME_k,m
= (2m-M)(2m + M) + 2E_k,m(2m-M + M)
= (2m-M)(2m + M) + 4mE_k,m

=> E_k,m = -(2m-M)(2m + M)/(2m) = (M^2 - 4m^2)/2m

E_tot,m = (M^2 - 4m^2)/2m + m = (M^2 - 2m^2)/2m

This is the nearest I've gotten to the right answer, which should be:

(M^2 - m^2)/2m

I'm not sure where I picked up that factor of 2.

This also seems like it took way too much work to actually figure out, which will be pretty important in a test scenario. Just deciding whether to solve using the invariant mass, or the momentum/energy squared relations took me a while. Is there a faster way to figure out this kind of annihilation/particle creation problem?
 
It's easily shown that your answer is feasible while the supposedly correct answer is not. A valid solution should be M=2m, p=0.
I get the same answer as you, but in a way that may be less complicated. At the least, it looks less complicated, but perhaps only by using simpler notation.
Momentum before = momentum after = p.
Total energy before = m + √(m2+p2) = Total energy after = √(M2+p2)
Squaring and collecting up terms:
4M2m2+4m2p2-M4 = 0
Whence
m2+p2 = [M4-4M2m2+4m4]/(4m2)
So √(m2+p2) = [M2-2m2]/(2m)
 
Thanks a lot for that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top