Invariant quantities in the EM field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the invariance of the quantities E² - B² and \(\vec{E} \cdot \vec{B}\) under Lorentz and Poincaré transformations in electromagnetic (EM) fields. These invariants are crucial for understanding the behavior of electric (E) and magnetic (B) fields, particularly in relation to solutions of Maxwell's equations beyond just EM waves. The first invariant, E² - B², is significant for constructing Lagrangian densities that yield second-order field equations in time. The second invariant, \(\vec{E} \cdot \vec{B}\), is not always zero, indicating that not all radiated EM fields are strictly waves.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz and Poincaré transformations
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic field theory
  • Basic concepts of Lagrangian mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Lorentz invariance in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore solutions to Maxwell's equations beyond electromagnetic waves
  • Learn about Lagrangian density formulation in field theory
  • Investigate the physical significance of the scalar product \(\vec{E} \cdot \vec{B}\)
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism, theoretical physicists exploring field theories, and students seeking to deepen their understanding of the invariance properties of electromagnetic fields.

Mentz114
Messages
5,429
Reaction score
292
I understand that the quantities

[tex]E^2 - B^2[/tex]

[tex]\vec{E} \cdot \vec{B}[/tex]

(the dot is vector inner product).
where E and B are the electric and magnetic components of an EM wave,
are invariant under Lorentz/Poincare transformations.
Can someone explain the physical significance of this ? Is either quantity related to the velocity of light ( or the invariance of the velocity of light ) ?

The second expression must be zero at all times surely ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mentz114 said:
I understand that the quantities

[tex]E^2 - B^2[/tex]

[tex]\vec{E} \cdot \vec{B}[/tex]

(the dot is vector inner product).
where E and B are the electric and magnetic components of an EM wave,
are invariant under Lorentz/Poincare transformations.
Can someone explain the physical significance of this ? Is either quantity related to the velocity of light ( or the invariance of the velocity of light ) ?

The second expression must be zero at all times surely ?

Not necessarily wave. An EM wave is just a particular case of a radiated EM field. That's why the scalar product is not always 0, because the radiated EM field is not always a wave.

There's not too much physical significance of the invariants, just that the first one is good for a lagrangian density since it leads to field equations second order in time.

Daniel.
 
Thanks, Daniel.

I didn't know there are solutions to Maxwells equations other than the EM wave.

It's hard getting my head around the idea that the E and B fields 'mix' like space and time, when boosted.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K