Invention: but dont know if it works.

  • Thread starter Thread starter corra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Invention Works
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of creating a double keel hull system similar to a catamaran, designed for modular boat construction. The concept involves building identical hulls that can serve different functions, such as housing engines or storage, allowing for easy evacuation and replacement of damaged modules. While there are no technical barriers to this idea, practicality and design challenges remain significant considerations. The proposed system could be applied to various types of vessels, including tankers and bulk transports, emphasizing the importance of secure connections between modules to prevent friction and instability at sea. Overall, the idea presents an innovative approach to modular maritime design, though its implementation would require careful planning and engineering.
corra
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
hola, first of. I am not mentally gifted enough to understand math involving letters so if you got a response to the following thread please make it in laymans terms.

The invension?... more like an idea.

would it be possible to make a double keel hull. (like a catamaran)
that would be stable and not cause to much friction if mounted on an identical hull?

the idea is such.
build boat modules that have the exact same outer appearance and form but that can be modified inside. for instance.

2 of the hulls deal with engines and ventilation and the other hulls can be storage hulls or ballrooms. u name it.

in the event of for instance a crash where 1 hull is damaged beyond repair you could simply evacuate that module. disconnect it and let it sink.

this is just an idea and i don't know if it has any other uses or if it is even doable.
thats why i wrote it here.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I can think of absolutely no reason why it wouldn't work. Practicality, on the other hand, is an entirely different matter. There could be a bit of overkill there. Check this out and see if it's along the line of what you're thinking.
http://www.gizmag.com/go/6777/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is certainly an advantage to removable engine pods, as the link shows, but a reconfigurable cruise ship? I'm not sure why one would do that, but as Danger said, there is no technical reason why it couldn't work.
 
doesnt have to be a cruise ship.

could be a tanker, a bulk transport or maybe a refridgerator ship.

its all in the way you design the interior of the module.

each module is seaworthy on its own but useless.
if you put 6 together then its a diffrent matter. 1 hull for the engine and ventilation etc. and the other 5 for cargo transport for instance.

put the engine in the back and lock the modules together. (like a train)
and its ready.
being as it is on the sea it would have to be locked solid. no friction during waves etc.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top