Inverse function lingo

  • Thread starter ZeroPivot
  • Start date
  • #1
54
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

can a function thats not inversable be inversible in certain interwalls. is it ok to say its inversable in this specific intervall or cant the function ever be called inversible?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,833
955
Yes, but technically, it wouldn't be the same function.

For example, [itex]f(x)= x^2[/itex]is not "invertible" because it is neither "one to one" nor "onto". However, if we restrict the domain to the "non-negative real numbers" then its inverse is [itex]\sqrt{x}[/itex]. If we restrict the domain to the "non-positive real numbers" then its inverse is [itex]-\sqrt{x}[/itex].

However, the domain of a function is as much a part of its definition as the "formula". That is, "[itex]f(x)= x^2[/itex], for x any real number", "[itex]g(x)=x^2[/itex], for x any non-negative real number", and [itex]h(x)= x^2[/itex], for x any non-negative real number" are three different functions. The first does not have an inverse, the last two do.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #3
54
0
Yes, but technically, it wouldn't be the same function.

For example, [itex]f(x)= x^2[/itex]is not "invertible" because it is neither "one to one" nor "onto". However, if we restrict the domain to the "non-negative real numbers" then its inverse is [itex]\sqrt{x}[/itex]. If we restrict the domain to the "non-positive real numbers" then its inverse is [itex]-\sqrt{x}[/itex].

However, the domain of a function is as much a part of its definition as the "formula". That is, "[itex]f(x)= x^2[/itex], for x any real number", "[itex]g(x)=x^2[/itex], for x any non-negative real number", and [itex]h(x)= x^2[/itex], for x any non-negative real number" are three different functions. The first does not have an inverse, the last two do.
can i say function y=x^2 is inversible for x E [0 ,4] ?
 
  • #4
Office_Shredder
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,750
99
Yes, the function
[tex] f: [0,4]\to [0,16],\ x\mapsto x^2 [/tex]
is an invertible function because of the domain that has been specified (also it needs to have the right codomain, or it won't be an onto function, but that's more of a technicality that is washed away by restricting the codomain to whatever the range is)
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #5
33,505
5,191
can i say function y=x^2 is inversible for x E [0 ,4] ?
"Inversible" is not a word - the one you want is invertible.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #6
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,833
955
So why is "reversible" a word and not "revertible"?
 
  • #7
33,505
5,191
"Inversible" is not a word - the one you want is invertible.
Possibly because the adjectives invertible and reversible come from the verbs to invert and to reverse, respectively.
 

Related Threads on Inverse function lingo

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
625
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
581
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
523
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Top