Determining & Proving Inverse Functions: Methodology?

AI Thread Summary
To determine if a function has an inverse, one can check if it is a bijection, which can be visually assessed using the horizontal line test. If any horizontal line intersects the graph of the function more than once, the function does not have an inverse. Additionally, the discussion raises the issue of functions that are invertible but whose inverses cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions, such as f(x) = x + sin(x). There is a query about whether a general method exists to prove that such functions lack an inverse in elementary terms. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing the invertibility of functions.
jgens
Gold Member
Messages
1,575
Reaction score
50
Does anyone know of an existing methodology for determining and proving whether or not a function has an inverse?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How about by determining if the function is a bijection? Or am I missing something here?
 
The "horizontal line test". How many times does any horizontal line cross the graph of the function? Which is the same as "determining if the function is a bijection"!
 
Thank you very much. Just a brief follow up question: Suppose a function is invertable but the inverse has no representation in terms of elementary functions (I'm including trigonometric and logarithmic functions in this category) - I think f(x) = x + sin(x) would meet this criterion - is there a general method for proving that the function does not have an inverse expressable in terms of elementary functions?

Sorry if that doesn't make sense.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top