Inverse functions?

  • Thread starter rsnd
  • Start date
  • #1
26
0
Inverse functions???

I was just wondering...Isnot y=x the only function that is the inverse of itself??? How do you go on about saying it in a formal way??? I mean as response to your assignment question. where you are not just told to not only give fatcts but "Justify your claim with appropriate proofs!"???

Thanks
K. Cv.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
13,019
567
There's a nice graphic-related proof.A function that is invertible on a domain is bijective,which means both injective & surjective.In terms of graphs,the graph of the function and its inverse (if it exists) are symmetrical wrt the graph of f(x)=x.If the two functions coincide,then they coincide with the identity function.

Daniel.
 
  • #3
367
1
Do you mean to say, y=x is the only function where [tex]f(x)=f^{-1}(x)[/tex]?

Proof by counterexample:

[tex]y=\frac{1}{x}[/tex]
 
  • #4
Zurtex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1,120
1
Any function which is symmetrical from the line y=x is the inverse of itself, in that sense there will be an infinite number of them.

Although perhaps very few simple functions, another easy one is [tex]y^2 + x^2 = r^2[/tex]
 
  • #5
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
13,019
567
The identity function is invertible on all R...

Daniel.
 
  • #6
mathwonk
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2020 Award
11,093
1,295
how about y = -x, y = -1/x,....
 
  • #7
vsage
If your question was simply "prove of disprove: y = x is the only function that is its own inverse", you can just give a counterexample and be done. Is this how the question you were given was worded?
 
  • #8
2
0
precalculus question

Hello,

I have a similar question; I'm currently taking precalculus, and I have a question here that I'm stuck on:

"Let f(x)=(ax+b)/(cx-a), (cx-a)?0. Show that f(x) is it's own inverse."

I understand, graphically, that f(x) equals its inverse in this case, because they are reflections of each other over y=x. I've graphically solved this using technology and by-hand sketches. And I also understand that the restiction on the denominator come about because the equation would then be undefined (if it equalled 0). But I cannot figure out why this is, algebraically.

Can anyone help me, or give me a hint?

Thanks very much,
sam.grotz
 
  • #9
370
0
Hello,

I have a similar question; I'm currently taking precalculus, and I have a question here that I'm stuck on:

"Let f(x)=(ax+b)/(cx-a), (cx-a)?0. Show that f(x) is it's own inverse."

I understand, graphically, that f(x) equals its inverse in this case, because they are reflections of each other over y=x. I've graphically solved this using technology and by-hand sketches. And I also understand that the restiction on the denominator come about because the equation would then be undefined (if it equalled 0). But I cannot figure out why this is, algebraically.

Can anyone help me, or give me a hint?

Thanks very much,
sam.grotz
Just compute f(f(x)).
 
  • #10
uart
Science Advisor
2,776
9
Hello,

I have a similar question; I'm currently taking precalculus, and I have a question here that I'm stuck on:

"Let f(x)=(ax+b)/(cx-a), (cx-a)?0. Show that f(x) is it's own inverse."

I understand, graphically, that f(x) equals its inverse in this case, because they are reflections of each other over y=x. I've graphically solved this using technology and by-hand sketches. And I also understand that the restiction on the denominator come about because the equation would then be undefined (if it equalled 0). But I cannot figure out why this is, algebraically.

Can anyone help me, or give me a hint?

Thanks very much,
sam.grotz
Sam, just start with [tex]y = \frac{ax+b}{cx-a}[/tex] and then rearrage it to get "x" by itself on the LHS.

Whats happening. Are you just getting stuck on the algebra to do this rearrangement?
 
  • #11
409
12
Any function which is symmetrical from the line y=x is the inverse of itself, in that sense there will be an infinite number of them.

Although perhaps very few simple functions, another easy one is [tex]y^2 + x^2 = r^2[/tex]
[tex]y^2 + x^2 = r^2[/tex] is not a function, because for any value of x < r, you can get two different values of y.
 
  • #12
131
0
A silly conjecture... An infinite number of counterexamples.
 
  • #13
2
0
Thanks!

Thanks to ZioX and uart for giving me the helpful direction.:smile: I think what I must have done before was just think too far ahead, and presume that it couldn't be simplified in that way. Thanks again! It turns out it actually ends up simplifying to just:

y=x

peace,
sam.grotz
 
  • #14
what is the inverse function of sin x. I don't know if it is written correctly
 
  • #15
matt grime
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
9,395
3
arcsin, or sin^{-1}

and if you think that it is avoiding the issue, then you need to rethink your view of what a function is.
 

Related Threads on Inverse functions?

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
775
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
586
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
687
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
Top