Inverse Laplace transform with unit step function

shaqywacky
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello again.

First off, I wasn't sure how to say this in the title but I'm not taking the inverse Laplace transform of a unit step function. I'm taking the Laplace transform of something that comes out to the unit step function.

I have this question, which is a similar version of the question I am trying to solve. This is also the solution but I have no idea what happened.

laplace_unit.png

(sorry, I don't know why that is so small, click to make it bigger)

So the first part of that image is just the inverse Laplace transform I am trying to solve. The first step I saw was to do partial fractions. When I do that I get:
\frac{e}{s+1} + \frac{1}{s}
I'm omitting the inverse Laplace transform here because I don't know how to do it in latex.

But as you can see, the solution maunual got:
\frac{e^{-s}}{s} - \frac{e^{-s}}{s+1}

Clearly there is something I do not understand about this. I can get the correct answer after this, I just don't understand this step.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi !
You question seems confused.
You must not use the same variable (s) for the function and for the Laplace transform of the function.
Please write clearly :
"The Laplace transform of f(x) is F(s)"
or
"The inverse Laplace transform of F(s) is f(x)"
Then, write clearly the expression of the known function : is it f(x) or F(s) ?
 
I don't think I did. I never took any inverse Laplace transforms in my post. I'm talking about inside the Laplace transform. I didn't know how to use the Laplace transform in Latex, so I omitted it and made a note of it but I don't think I was being very clear. I'm just omitting the notation of the Laplace transform. So the equations I posted (besides the ones in the picture) are what's inside of the Laplace transform I'm trying to solve.

To try to clarify, I just don't understand the first step that is in the picture. So I don't see how they went from
\frac{e^{-s}}{s(s-1)}[/size]

to

\frac{e^{-s}}{s} - \frac{e^{-s}}{s-1}[/size]

Thanks.
 
Hi !

Do you know how to write a polynomial fraction as a sum of simple terms ?
Have a look to the attachment :
 

Attachments

  • obviously.JPG
    obviously.JPG
    7.2 KB · Views: 588
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top