Investigating the Hydrothermal Decomposition of Hemicellulose

  • Thread starter Thread starter hank63
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decomposition
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the hydrothermal decomposition of hemicellulose, specifically addressing the high conversion rate of 20% to acetic acid reported by the user, which contrasts with findings in other literature. There is uncertainty about the fate of the acetic acid and the quantities of other byproducts like H2, CH4, CO, and CO2. Participants emphasize the need for more detailed information about the user's reaction model and the referenced studies to provide accurate troubleshooting. Questions arise regarding the model's consideration of other compounds like 2-furaldehyde and lactic acid, as well as the oxygen limitations in the process. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexity of reaction kinetics in this area and the need for comprehensive data.
hank63
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm working on the hydrothermal decomposition of hemicellulose and one of the reaction products is acetic acid. The incomplete reaction model I'm using says 20% of my original hemicellulose is converted into acetic acid. In comparison to other papers this seems to be too high. So were does my acetic acid go?
I know some H2, CH4, CO and CO2 is produced, but not in what quantities. I thought that detailed reaction kinetics on the subject would be "known", but I'm not able to find it.
A paper that is close by is: "Renewable hydrogen production by a mild-temperature steam reforming of the model compound acetic acid derived from bio-oil" by Z. Li et al from 2012.
I'm working on the hydrothermal decomposition of hemicellulose and one of the reaction products is acetic acid. The incomplete reaction model I'm using says 20% of my original hemicellulose is converted into acetic acid. In comparison to other papers this seems to be too high. So were does my acetic acid go?
I know some H2, CH4, CO and CO2 is produced, but not in what quantities. I thought that detailed reaction kinetics on the subject would be "known", but I'm not able to find it.
A paper that is close by is: "Renewable hydrogen production by a mild-temperature steam reforming of the model compound acetic acid derived from bio-oil" by Z. Li et al from 2012.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org


Yours, the incomplete reaction model's or the 'other papers'? Yours, the incomplete reaction model's or the 'other papers'?
 


ROFL

That's what happens when you post in several places using copy/paste.
 


Mine in this case is the incomplete reaction model.Mine in this case is the incomplete reaction model.
 


hank63 said:
Mine in this case is the incomplete reaction model.Mine in this case is the incomplete reaction model.

OK, OK! :smile: Seriously though, you don't tell us anything about your reaction model (name, author, basis, etc...), you don't tell us anything about the "other papers" (again, name author, journal reference, etc...) but you want us to troubleshoot or account for differences between them? Take a minute and think about that.

Does your model accurately account for 2-furaldehyde, 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furaldehyde and lactic acid? Do the "other papers" discuss these as well? Is this an oxygen limited system and how is supplemental oxygen handled for your process?
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top