Investigating Unexpected Power Increase with Analogue FDM

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the implementation of Analogue FDM with single carrier modulation techniques like QAM and QPSK, specifically examining the SNR differences when using multiplexed signals. The user models two I and Q channel pairs in MATLAB, upconverting them to different frequencies and downconverting without a bandpass filter. While transmitting a single carrier at 2.2 GHz yields an SNR of 16 dB, multiplexing two carriers results in an unexpected SNR increase to 22 dB at the same BER. The user seeks to understand the reason behind the additional 6 dB power requirement and potential solutions. The response suggests that the discrepancy may stem from the difference in modulation schemes, particularly the increased bit density of 4-QAM compared to PSK.
thavamaran
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I am trying to implement Analogue FDM on top of my single carrier modulation (eg: QAM and QPSK) of Multi carrier modulation (eg: OFDM). For an example, I have two different pair of I and Q channels, where first pair is upconverted at 2.2 GHz and the next pair at say 2.7 GHz and them MUX them together as in FDM.

I model them in matlab. Then when I downconvert them, it is possible to downconvert them without Bandpass filter as its ideal case in matlab, with using correlator receiver and correlate them at exact upconverted frequency to remove the frequency component.

This all works perfectly fine, the problem is, when I transmit a signal say at 2.2 GHz without any MUX, I get SNR of 16 dB at the BER that I want, but when I MUX two different carriers and downconvert them, my SNR reaches almost 22 dB at the same BER.

Im really curious to know what would be the problem, why it needs higher energy, is there anyway that I can solve this 6 dB of extra power. Please advice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think you will find that it is just the difference between PSK and 4-QAM. You are putting twice as many bits into the spectrum.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top