Ion Pressure Theory: Can Negative Ions Lift a Metal Ball?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the feasibility of using negative ions to lift a positively charged metal ball. It proposes that charging the center of the ball positively while applying a negative charge to an external electrode could create a pressure effect from the negative ions attracted to the center. Theoretically, if the negative charge is strong enough, the pressure could cause the ball to rise. The concept hinges on the interaction between the charged components and the resulting forces. Overall, the idea suggests a novel approach to manipulating objects using ion pressure.
zboy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Ok well hello there everyone yes, i am still a novice at this but i was wondering this would it be possible. If i had a metal ball and i charged the center of it positively and then have an external electrode on the bottom charged negatively creating negative ions that cover the bottom half of the ball and then these negative ions would be attracted toward the center of the metal ball, with a strong enough charged to this negative electrode would the pressure of these negative ions trying to reach the center of the ball basically squeeze the ball into the air?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the center is connected to the ball you just try to lift yourself from pulling at your feet. If the center is disconnected then the ball will rise up and the center will move down until the two collide.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top