IR camera 1550 nm IR light source

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 3K views
btb4198
Messages
570
Reaction score
10
I am looking for an IR camera that can pick up 1550 nm IR light source on the pix level. I have silicon wafers and I am going to hit the pixels with a 1550 NM IR light source and I want to be able to see the pix with a IR cam. I want to connect it computer and use a C# application to view the pixels.
anyone knows a good cam I can use ?
one that is not too expensive.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
btb4198 said:
IR camera that can pick up 1550 nm IR light source on the pix level. I have silicon wafers and I am going to hit the pixels with a 1550 NM IR light source and I want to be able to see the pix with a IR cam.
What's a pix level? What do you mean by "hit the pixels" with IR? Are you going to be taking the pictures through a microscope?

What about this simple IR camera add-on for your cellphone?

Cell Phone Versions: https://www.flir.com/browse/home--outdoor/mobile-accessories/

Higher Resolution IR Cameras: https://www.flir.com/browse/home--outdoor/handheld-thermal-cameras/

flirone-gen3-pro.png
 

Attachments

  • flirone-gen3-pro.png
    flirone-gen3-pro.png
    60.3 KB · Views: 1,456
berkeman said:
What's a pix level? What do you mean by "hit the pixels" with IR? Are you going to be taking the pictures through a microscope?

What about this simple IR camera add-on for your cellphone?

Cell Phone Versions: https://www.flir.com/browse/home--outdoor/mobile-accessories/

Higher Resolution IR Cameras: https://www.flir.com/browse/home--outdoor/handheld-thermal-cameras/

View attachment 226958
when I say pix level,
I meant pixel level. so we can take a pic of a pixel.
and yes using a len to act like a microscope.
 
btb4198 said:
when I say pix level,
I meant pixel level. so we can take a pic of a pixel.
Sorry, but that doesn't make sense to me. A picture is composed of pixels. You don't take a picture of a pixel. You want to take pictures of your wafers, right?
 
berkeman said:
Sorry, but that doesn't make sense to me. A picture is composed of pixels. You don't take a picture of a pixel. You want to take pictures of your wafers, right?
The wafer it self has pixels. I have to zoom the IR cam into one pixel on the wafer and take a picture of it.
but really i need a cam that can do 1550 NM wavelength. I look at the cam you seen, and the data sheet does not give a that information
 
The spec sheet for the camera he suggested does give its spectral range (8 μm - 14 μm) but it is outside your range. It is a LWIR sensor. You need a SWIR sensor. That said, you still haven't really given much information. You need to know a lot more in order to pick out an IR camera. You can find them that run from 100 USD up to 200,000 USD and work all over the IR spectrum. You really need to narrow down your search criteria here.
 
btb4198 said:
The wafer it self has pixels. I have to zoom the IR cam into one pixel on the wafer and take a picture of it.
but really i need a cam that can do 1550 NM wavelength. I look at the cam you seen, and the data sheet does not give a that information
You want to take a thermal image of a sensor array? Is that your interest in 1500nm? Do you plan to use a narrow band filter to isolate around 1500nm?
All this stuff can be done but you want it cheap too. I think that could be the problem.
I was wondering. If you are looking for the temperature of the various pixels on an array, there may be other ways. For instance, the noise level from each pixel would be different, according to its temperature.
As I think it may not be feasible to do what you want, cheaply, perhaps you could give us a bit of context and the why's and wherefore's of your requirement.
 
sophiecentaur said:
You want to take a thermal image of a sensor array?
Yeah, I'm pretty confused as well. Knowing more about the project would help.
sophiecentaur said:
As I think it may not be feasible to do what you want, cheaply,
@btb4198 -- Another option if you only have to do this once or a small number of times would be to contract with a local test lab near you to use their test equipment for your photographs. We have all sorts of specialized labs here in Silicon Valley that we use for everything from Environmental Testing to Failure Analysis, etc. Contracting with them is usually cheaper than us buying the equipment ourselves.