IR thermometer pointed up into a cloudy sky?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Spinnor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ir Sky Thermometer
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the thermodynamic principles governing human body heat regulation in relation to environmental temperatures, specifically when using an infrared thermometer. Measurements indicated that the overcast sky temperature was 19°F, while the body temperature was 97.7°F, demonstrating that the sky acts as a heat sink. The conversation highlights the significance of evaporative cooling, particularly the concept of wet bulb temperature, which allows the body to utilize warm air as a heat sink under low humidity conditions. Overall, while the sky contributes to cooling, evaporative cooling plays a more substantial role in thermoregulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics, particularly heat engines
  • Familiarity with infrared thermometers and their applications
  • Knowledge of evaporative cooling principles
  • Concept of wet bulb temperature in meteorology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of thermodynamics related to heat engines
  • Explore the functionality and calibration of infrared thermometers
  • Study the effects of humidity on evaporative cooling
  • Investigate the concept of wet bulb temperature and its applications in environmental science
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, environmental scientists, and anyone interested in human physiology and thermoregulation, particularly in understanding how external temperatures affect body heat management.

Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,231
Reaction score
419
A physics stack question asks why when the air is hotter then your body thermodynamics allows your body to operate as a heat engine as a heat engine must have a sink for waste heat. See question here,

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/59316/human-as-a-heat-engine

Part of the answer is that normally the sky (except for the sun) is a net heat sink not a net heat source, if we point our hands to a clear sky our palms would sense cold? A clear sky is even colder then an overcast sky? Other fun with an infrared sensor?

Edit, point your hands towards the sky and away from the sun for a cooling effect?

With infrared thermometer in hand I measured plastic tarp in the shade, the overcast sky, inside my mouth. The outside temp was 47F in the shade by a standard thermometer.

plastic outside in shade, 48F
overcast sky (cloud ceiling at 7500ft), 19F
inside of my mouth, 97.7F.

So part of what keeps us from overheating is the fact that the sky is relatively cool?

Thanks for any help!
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
I doubt that's a significant portion of it. A much, much larger factor is the fact that evaporative cooling effectively allows you to use warm air (even if it's warmer than your skin) as a heat sink, so long as the humidity is relatively low. Specifically, look up the concept of the wet bulb temperature - that defines the lowest attainable temperature using evaporative cooling in a given environment.
 
cjl said:
I doubt that's a significant portion of it. A much, much larger factor is the fact that evaporative cooling effectively allows you to use warm air (even if it's warmer than your skin) as a heat sink, so long as the humidity is relatively low. Specifically, look up the concept of the wet bulb temperature - that defines the lowest attainable temperature using evaporative cooling in a given environment.

I was doubting along with you so did some Goggling,

https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#...42,d.dmg&fp=e67612c481f66f1f&biw=1093&bih=491

first listing,

http://books.google.com/books?id=n5...q=how much power does a human radiate&f=false

seems to say otherwise on page 192,

"A naked human will radiate as much energy as 13 100W light-bulbs"?

That is off a bit as they use 98F as the surface temp of a naked human. I'm topless and have a surface temp of 84F belly, 92.2F arm, 93.4 back.

Using 88F body temp in their calculations with room walls at 73F I get a net power radiated 1150W - 940W = 210W for a naked person in a 73F room?

So probably still small compared to the heat that can be removed by evaporative cooling and conduction?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 186 ·
7
Replies
186
Views
95K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K