Iron & Magnetic Fields: Permeability or Screening?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of iron in relation to magnetic fields, specifically addressing the concepts of magnetic permeability and screening. Participants explore whether iron's high permeability allows magnetic fields to pass through easily or if it instead screens or blocks these fields, particularly in the context of static and dynamic magnetic fields.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that iron has high permeability, allowing magnetic fields to pass through it more easily.
  • Others question whether iron screens static or dynamic magnetic fields, with some suggesting that it primarily screens static fields.
  • A participant mentions a belief that iron only blocks dynamic magnetic fields, indicating a lack of awareness about its interaction with static fields.
  • Some argue that high permeability means iron becomes highly magnetized in response to an external field, which they believe should not reduce the magnetic field behind it.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that placing an iron plate parallel to magnetic field lines can reduce the field at a sensor, challenging the idea that iron allows fields to pass through unimpeded.
  • One participant claims that field lines are conducted through the iron, contrasting this with superconductors that block magnetic fields entirely.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the concept of numerical simulations in understanding magnetic fields in ferromagnetic materials, citing the non-linear nature of the problem.
  • Concerns are raised about the interpretation of field lines entering iron, with some suggesting that the lines appear to be blocked rather than permeated.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether iron's high permeability allows magnetic fields to pass through or if it screens them. Multiple competing views remain, with ongoing debate about the nature of magnetic field interactions with iron.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of magnetic field behavior in ferromagnetic materials, including the influence of hysteresis and the non-linear nature of magnetic interactions. Participants express varying degrees of comfort with theoretical models and numerical simulations.

  • #31
jim hardy said:
Maybe a picture will help.

First thing to straighten out is magnetic flux , like current, makes its way back to the source. Think "Closed Loops".So in OP's first picture
here's what i would add to hopefully resolve the misunderstanding.

View attachment 101112

Flux (in red) will prefer the permeable iron slab , not the impermeable air behind it. (well, permeability of just 0.00000126)

That image in MarcusL's post 14 is just great , shows how an iron pipe routes flux around its hollow middle. That's why we use iron conduit for some sensitive signal wires in the power plant.
Thanks for taking the time to draw the magnetic lines in red. But I go back to my initial point and say you don't have any experimental proof that the lines actually go so deep in the iron plate, I think they enter the plate (if at all) very superficially, most of the lines just glide past the surface (iron screens them), that's why the poles seen at the edges are towards the magnet side and not also to the rear side. Also I have a great deal of trouble understanding why a N pole is not induced at A on the plate since iron is such a "high permeability" material, which also tells me iron's screening is real and not due to "high permeability".

The iron pipe routing the flux around its hollow middle can be seen also as a proof that iron is not permeable to magnetism, thus prevents the magnetic field from passing through. If the pipe were made of plastic, that would be a "highly permeable" material to the magnetic field since it let's the magnetic field pass through.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Charles Link said:
Any demonstration of this sort would not be very definitive. I think if you have any kind of resources available to work with magnetic materials of various kinds, you could do a lot of interesting things including experiments to create permanent magnets (even spherical ones), and even see what kind of field is necessary to reverse the magnetization. I do suggest if you have further interest in the subject, you google about experiments that have already been performed.
Thanks.
In order to avoid the magnetic field lines' tendency to return to the other pole, I think I will work with a very long magnet to have the magnetic lines leaving the pole radially.
 
  • #33
Dyon said:
I will probably write an article arguing against this common belief.
I think it is time to close this thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy, marcusl and jim hardy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K