Iron Man 3D Impressions: What's Your Review?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Julio R
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Iron Iron man
AI Thread Summary
Iron Man 3D received mixed reviews, with viewers noting that while it was enjoyable, it did not surpass the original Iron Man or The Avengers in terms of special effects. The plot was appreciated for its high-tech fantasy elements, contrasting with the more alien-focused narrative of The Avengers. Many found the film entertaining, particularly in its 3D format, but acknowledged inconsistencies with reality, suggesting that the film should be enjoyed as a science fantasy rather than a logical narrative. Overall, Iron Man 3 was seen as a fun experience, especially for fans of the genre.
Julio R
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
I saw Iron Man 3D last night, and I wanted to know from those who have watched it or will watch it, what do you think of it? The plot, characters, and production. In my opinion, it was good, but Avengers had better special effects. Iron man however had a better plot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Avengers was entertaining in a fluff way for me. Iron man can at least fool my brain into enjoying it because it's mostly high tech fantasy rather than aliens and weird space mutants.

I did see IM3 this weekend and really enjoyed it. Saw it 3D on ultra screen. Lots of fun if you don't think too hard. Not as good as the first, but much better than the second.
 
Definitely better than the second, the first is always better because it doesn't have as many of those, obviously fake events. In IM3 he can leap of high places and somehow land in the suit.

Spoiler Alert, and the genetic modified fire breathing freaks.
 
Julio R said:
In IM3 he can leap of high places and somehow land in the suit.

Good point, that is a little ridiculous! Exciting though!
 
Many other scenes that are horrifically inconsistent with reality. Actually too many to list. I guess it doesn't have to be a logical film.
 
Julio R said:
Many other scenes that are horrifically inconsistent with reality. Actually too many to list. I guess it doesn't have to be a logical film.

Crikey mate, of course it doesnt! :)

its a cartoon that's come to life, enjoy it and all movies like it, for what they are... great science fantasy and fun entertainment :)

Dave
 
Saw Mickey 17, a sci-fi comedy, based on Mickey 7, by Edward Ashton, which I read and thoroughly, thoroughly enjoyed. I am fascinated by stories of identity and the meaning of selfness. Mickey Barnes (Robert Pattison - of 'Sparkly Vampire' infamy) is running from a loan shark and, to escape the price on his head, signs up for an off-world trip to a new colony. The only way he could get selected is as an 'Expendable' - which is exactly what it sounds like: he gets all the suicide missions...
So far I've been enjoying the show but I am curious to hear from those a little more knowledgeable of the Dune universe as my knowledge is only of the first Dune book, The 1984 movie, The Sy-fy channel Dune and Children of Dune mini series and the most recent two movies. How much material is it pulling from the Dune books (both the original Frank Herbert and the Brian Herbert books)? If so, what books could fill in some knowledge gaps?
Back
Top