Irreducible polynomials over ring of integers

pedja
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Is it true that polynomials of the form :

f_n= x^n+x^{n-1}+\cdots+x^{k+1}+ax^k+ax^{k-1}+\cdots+a

where \gcd(n+1,k+1)=1 , a\in \mathbb{Z^{+}} , a is odd number , a>1, and a_1\neq 1

are irreducible over the ring of integers \mathbb{Z}?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstein%27s_criterion" cannot be applied to the polynomials of this form.

Example :

The polynomial x^4+x^3+x^2+3x+3 is irreducible over the integers but none of the criteria above can be applied on this polynomial.

Thanks in advance...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I hope this helps.

The polynomial x4+x3+x2+x +1 is the cyclotomic polynomial \Phi5(x). I believe the general polynomial that you described is also the monic cyclotomic polynomial \Phin(x) in Z[x] with degree \varphi(n). These polynomials are irreducible. The proof is a little tedious and not exactly immediate. Check out this paper

http://www.math.umn.edu/~garrett/m/algebra/notes/08.pdf

I think it does a pretty good job. Then again, if that general polynomial turns out to not be cyclotomic, I'll have to start over and come up with something new
 
These polynomials are not cyclotomic polynomials.
f_n can be rewritten into form :

f_n=\displaystyle \sum_{i=0}^n x^{i}+(a-1)\cdot \displaystyle \sum_{i=0}^k x^{i} ,or

f_n=\frac{x^{n+1}+(a-1)x^{k+1}-a}{x-1}
 
Maybe if you give a different example it would be easier to see. I don't really see much of a correlation between the general case and the example you gave. Anyways, you can always fall back on the general technique for finding irreduciblity.

Let I be a proper ideal in the integral domain R and let p(x) be the monic polynomial in R[x]. If the image of p(x) in (R/I)[x] cannot be factored in (R/I)[x] into two polynomials of smaller dgree, then p(x) is irreducible in R[x].

Start reducing mod some n and see where that gets you. If it's small degree then it's pretty obvious. A higher degree will probably take a little work. Unfortunately, this technique doesn't always work, but I can't think of any other irreducibility criteria.
 
Wait I just thought of another one: Hilbert's Irreducibility Theorem.
 
Also Kronecker's Method
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top