Is 0.999... really equal to 1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dooga Blackrazor
  • Start date Start date
Dooga Blackrazor
Messages
258
Reaction score
0
0.999... = 1 (Why?)

Sorry to put such a basic question on here, but it's not for homework so I figured I'd post here.

On these forums, I've saw the issue of .99... = 1 brought up before; however, I recently discovered it in Math class.

My teacher said it equals one because it is being rounded; however, it actually doesn't equal one. I understand what she means; however, for some reason, I recall seeing a formula that mathematically proved .99... = 1 without rounding. Perhaps I am seeing things.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That formula (or the closest thing to it, there is no formula) is in those fifty other threads.
 
If your teacher said that 0.999... is only approximately 1, then she is wrong.
 
Dooga Blackrazor said:
My teacher said it equals one because it is being rounded; however, it actually doesn't equal one.

Your teacher is wrong.

Quickie demonstration:

\frac{1}{3}=0.\bar{3}

3\left(\frac{1}{3}\right)=3(0.\bar{3})

1=0.\bar{9}

And if your teacher still thinks that 0.\bar{9}=1, then ask him/her to try to find a real number between the two. It can't be done.
 
Not only is this not a new topic, it's a regular topic!

My only objection to (1/3)= 0.33333... so 1= 0.999... is that the same people who object to 1= 0.9999... would also object to 3(0.3333...)= 0.999...- and they have a point. Proving one is equivalent to proving the other.

The real point is that, by definition of a "base 10 number system", 0.999... means the infinite series .9+ .09+ .009+... which is a geometric series whose sum is 1.

By the way, what grade is this teacher? And who is his/her principal/college president?!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
62
Views
10K
2
Replies
91
Views
6K
Replies
121
Views
27K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top