Is 2 pi i equal to 0, contradicting the fact that pi and i cannot equal 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicktacik
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the expression e^{2 pi i} equating to 1 and its implications for the logarithm function in the complex plane. It highlights that while ln(e^{2 pi i}) equals 0, this does not mean that 2 pi i is equal to 0, as the logarithm of complex numbers is defined up to multiples of 2 pi. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the complex logarithm, which differs from its real counterpart. It also points out a common misconception regarding the equality of logarithmic and exponential functions in complex analysis. Ultimately, the discussion clarifies that the equality does not imply that pi or i equals zero.
nicktacik
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
This one has me stumped.

e^{\pi i} = -1
e^{2 \pi i} = (-1) ^ 2 = 1
ln(e^{2 \pi i}) = ln(1) = 0
2 \pi i = 0

Or is 2 pi i actually 0, and this does not actually imply that either pi = 0 or i = 0?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Since 2 \pi i is an imaginary number you must use the definition of LN in the complex plane. You are using the definition for the real number line.

in the complex plane we have:

logz = log(r) + i \theta

edit (changed my definition of z)
r = |z|
and
\theta = arg(z)
 
Last edited:
More than that - logs of complex numbers are only defined up to multiples of 2pi. One can ought to take the principal branch - this is just a slightly more complicated variation on the square root 'fallacies'.
 
The mistake is here:
\ln e^z = z
This is not true for complex numbers.

Note: the other way around:
\exp (\ln z) = z, \ z\not =0
Is true.
 
Ok thanks. As you can see, I haven't taken my complex variables class yet.
 
its sort of like saying, (2^2 =4 and (-2)^2 = 4 so 2 = -2.)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top