Is 2000 Kilocalories the Average Human Need per Day?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Piotrovskiy Yury
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Human Power Watts
AI Thread Summary
2000 kilocalories is recognized as the average daily energy requirement for humans, equating to approximately 97 watts when converted to power. This calculation is based on the conversion of kilocalories to kilojoules and the division by the total seconds in a day. While this figure is generally accurate for an average individual, it may not apply to those with higher energy demands, such as athletes or individuals engaging in intense physical activities. It is suggested to round the power estimate to "100 watts, give or take" for simplicity. Overall, 2000 kilocalories serves as a reasonable baseline for average daily energy needs.
Piotrovskiy Yury
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Human power 97 watts?

2000 kilocalories is the average human need per day.

2000 kilocalories is 8373.6 kilojoules divided by 86,400 seconds in days = 97 watts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You calling me a light bulb!? :wink:
 
Piotrovskiy Yury said:
Summary:: 2000 kilocalories is the average human need per day.2000 kilocalories is 8373.6 kilojoules divided by 86,400 seconds in days = 97 watts.

Human power 97 watts?

2000 kilocalories is the average human need per day.

2000 kilocalories is 8373.6 kilojoules divided by 86,400 seconds in days = 97 watts.
Yes, that's about right. Did you have a question?
 
No way do you have more than one significat digit in this calculation so you might want to say "100 watts, give or take" instead of "97 watts", but other than that, yes, it's about right in order of magnitude terms... at least for the average human exerting themselves at an average level so that 2000 kcal/day is reasonable.

Don't expect that number to apply to an American football team, or anyone on the day that they run a marathon.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top