Is 3^4 the Correct Answer? - Erin

  • Thread starter Thread starter Erin_Sharpe
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the correctness of two mathematical expressions. Erin confirms that the first expression, (3^5/3^3)^2 = 3^4 = 81, is correct. However, there is confusion regarding the second expression involving logarithms, specifically whether it is written as 3log6 - log612 + log62 = log68. Participants emphasize the need for clearer notation to avoid ambiguity in mathematical expressions. The conversation highlights the importance of precise communication in mathematics for accurate problem-solving.
Erin_Sharpe
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
(3^5/3^3)^2
= 3^2+2
=3^4
= 81

3log6-log612 + log62=
log68

as a final answer?

Appreciate it if someone could tell me if I'm right or not.

Thanks,
Erin
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You got the first one right.
In the second one, do you mean log63 ?
 
how did u get the second answer...? because i really did get log68
 
He is asking to rewrite your second problem correctly. What does the 6 mean in the first term?
 
oh i see now. but, no i don't mean log63...its written in the text exactly the way I wrote it.
 
Erin sharpe:
You HAVE to use a less ambiguous notation!
Do you mean:
a) 3log_{6}
b) 3log(6)

And do you mean:
c) log_{6}(12)
Or
d)log(612)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top