Is 570 Meters a Correct Estimate for the Balloon's Height?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daniiel
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the accuracy of estimating the height of a hot air balloon at 570 meters based on the horizontal motion of a dropped bag, which lands 15 meters away from a boat. The calculations involved using horizontal and vertical motion equations, but doubts were raised about the assumption of the balloon's height, suggesting that a height of 570 meters would result in a longer horizontal distance. Additionally, there is a question about the tension required to move a 300 kg pallet of bricks across a smooth surface, with clarification provided that only the static friction needs to be overcome. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between weight, friction, and the forces required for motion. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the complexities of physics calculations and the need for careful consideration of assumptions.
Daniiel
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
I just want to double check that this is right, i have a feeling it's wrong because 570 metres doesn't seem right
1. Homework Statement
A hot air balloon is floating above the surface of a small lake and, in the early morning breeze, is drifting at 5km/h horizontally. A 4.5 kg bag is dropped from the balloon when it is directly above a boat. The bag lands in the water 15m away from the boat. How high is the balloon?


2. Homework Equations

x-x0 = (v0costheta)t
and the vertical formula y-y0 = (vosintheta)-1/2gt^2
3. The Attempt at a Solution
I used the horizontal motion formula to find t
i used the initial velocity as 1.39m/s
x=15
and got t=10.79
then used the vertical formula to find y
which was y = 4.9 x 116.43 = 570

I just followed an example of horizontal and vertical motion in my textbook
i think assuming the degree = 0 might of made my answer wrong or somthing
i kinda think that if the balloon was 570 the bag would of landed further than 15m
i apologize for my messiness

I also have another question, sorry I am not very confident with physics because there's always somthing I am not thinking about.

Question
In order to move a 300kg pallet of bricks across a smooth surface you need a rope tied to the back of your car. If the static friction is 0.2, how much tension is in the rope when the pallet just starts to move?

i just did 300 x 9.8 = 2940N
0.2 x 2940 = 588N
so is the required force to move the pallet 588+2940?
and the tension in the rope when it starts to move 588+2940?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first one is correct. People generally underestimate how quickly things fall. In reality the speed at the end of the fall would be 105 m/s and air friction would reduce this a lot.

To move the pallet you only have to overcome the static friction. The 2940 N is the weight of the pallet, you don't have to lift it.
 
Thanks a lot for your reply.
So, just to clarify.
If there was no static friction on a smooth surface, you wouldn't need any force to pull the pallet?
Like you don't have to over come the normal or anything?

also just to double check, if you only need to over come 588N would the tension in the rope when it begins to move be 588N?
Or like >588 so like it begins to move at 589
 
You still need a force to accelerate the pallet, but any force greater than 0 will do.
The acceleration will be very small for a small force (f = ma)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top