Is a 2004 Discovery About Physics Still Relevant Today?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LostInSpaceTime
  • Start date Start date
LostInSpaceTime
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I just stumbled upon this and I was wondering of it's validity.I would have thought if this was true it would have been out in the mainstream even more. It's from 2004 but i would think still relevant. I would like to hear some more about this from u guys...like, is this for real?...this seems to be one of those changes in physics that would screw up some stuff, no? What would the repercussions be if it happened again.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LostInSpaceTime said:
I just stumbled upon this and I was wondering of it's validity.I would have thought if this was true it would have been out in the mainstream even more. It's from 2004 but i would think still relevant. I would like to hear some more about this from u guys...like, is this for real?...this seems to be one of those changes in physics that would screw up some stuff, no? What would the repercussions be if it happened again.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092.html

these Variable Speed of Light (VSL) theories spring up periodically. then they get some attention in the popular press. then they get refuted by the likes of Michael Duff
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0208093 and http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0110060
or John Barrow
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units#Planck_units_and_the_invariant_scaling_of_nature
point out what the problem is.

i guess what i think I've said before:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1357747&postcount=14
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1399479&postcount=32

the laws of physics doesn't give a rat's ass about what units we use to measure things. the speed of light is necessarily always 1 Planck length per Planck time and if we think that the speed of light (in units we like to use) has changed, the more salient observation iis whether the number of Planck lengths per meter has changed or if the number of Planck times per second has changed, or both (these ratios are dimensionless numbers) and, if that is the case (making us think the speed of E&M propagation has changed, we should be noting the change in one of these dimensionless values and ask why that.
 
Ok Thanks...I was just wondering. Because like you mentioned every once and a while you hear about it but i never asked until now.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top