Is a Bloch wave periodic in reciprocal space?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the periodicity of Bloch waves in reciprocal space, specifically whether the Bloch wave function retains periodicity when translated by reciprocal lattice vectors. Participants explore the implications of this periodicity on the components of the Bloch wave, particularly the function \( u_{nk}(r) \), and the definitions involved in the context of solid-state physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the Bloch wave function \( \Psi_{nk}(r) \) is periodic in reciprocal space, suggesting that \( \Psi_{nk}(r) = \Psi_{n(k+G)}(r) \) and questioning how this relates to the periodicity of \( u_{nk}(r) \).
  • Another participant argues that the question is more about definition, indicating that physics only constrains \( u \) and \( \Psi \) within the first Brillouin zone, allowing for the imposition of periodicity as a definitional choice.
  • A different viewpoint asserts that the Bloch function is not periodic in reciprocal space, noting that the coefficients \( a_k(G) \) can differ for various \( G \) values, which contradicts the notion of periodicity.
  • In response, another participant contends that the Bloch function can be defined to be periodic in reciprocal space, although alternative non-periodic choices exist.
  • Further elaboration includes a mathematical representation of the Bloch function in reciprocal space, emphasizing that for periodicity, the coefficients \( a_k(G) \) would need to be equal, which is generally not the case.
  • Another participant acknowledges the previous points but questions whether they directly address the original inquiry regarding the periodicity of \( \Psi_{nk}(r) \) and its implications for \( u_{kn}(r) \).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the periodicity of the Bloch wave function in reciprocal space. Some assert that it can be defined as periodic, while others maintain that it is not periodic due to the nature of the coefficients involved. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the periodicity of the Bloch wave function may depend on the definitions used and the specific conditions of the crystal potential. The relationship between the coefficients \( a_k(G) \) and their implications for periodicity are also noted as complex and not universally applicable.

fluon
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A Bloch wave has the following form..

## \Psi_{nk}(r)=e^{ik\cdot r}u_{nk}(r)##

The ##u_{nk}## part is said to be periodic in real space. But what about reciprocal space? I've had a hard time finding a direct answer to this question, but I seem to remember reading somewhere that the entire Bloch wave is periodic in k-space i.e. ##\Psi_{nk}(r)=\Psi_{n(k+G)}(r).## In that case, whatever additional exponential factor ##e^{iG\cdot r}## we gained from a k-space translation must occur as ##e^{-iG\cdot r}## in the ##u_{nk}## piece. How can we tell without knowing the exact form of the ##u_{nk}## piece though? I think that ##u_{nk}## comes from the Fourier coefficients of the periodic potential. Maybe it has something to do with this?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not a physical question but one of definition. Physics only fixes u and psi inside the first Brillouin zone. So you can simply impose periodicity in G as a definition.
 
The Bloch function can be written as ## \psi _{nk} (k) = \sum _G a_k (G) exp^{ i(k+G)r} ##. In reciprocal space, it will be non-zero at periodic points but the coefficients ## a_k (G) ## are, in general, different for different Gs. Some may be the same due to symmetry or other feature of the crystal potential.
So, the answer to your question, is no, the Block function is not periodic in reciprocal space.
 
Henryk said:
So, the answer to your question, is no, the Block function is not periodic in reciprocal space.
That's not correct. The Boch function can always be chosen to be periodic in reciprocal space (though alternative non-periodic choices are possible).
 
Specifically, if ##k'=k+K##, where K is some reciprocal lattice vector, you can write ## \psi _{nk} (k) = \sum _G a_k (G) \exp{ i(k+G)r}= \sum _G a_k (G)\exp(iKr) \exp{ i(k'+G-K)r}=\sum _G a_k (G+K)\exp(iKr) \exp{ i(k'+G)r}##. So you can simply define ##a_{k'}(G):=a_k(G+K)\exp(iKr)##.
 
DrDu,

A function is periodic if ## f(r + T) = f(r)##, right?. Let's just write the Bloch function in reciprocal space. We picked a Bloch function with a specific value of ##k##, so let us label the reciprocal space variable as ##k'##. The function is reciprocal space is ## \psi(k') = \sum _G a_k(G) \delta(k' - (k+G)) ##. For the Bloch function to be periodic in reciprocal space, all the ##a_k(G)##'s would have to be equal. But they, in general, cannot. The Hamiltonian in reciprocal space is a matrix with off-diagonal coefficients equal to ##V(G)## and the ##a_k(G)##'s are defining eigenvectors of the matrix, that is, there is a well defined relationship between them. Re-labeling the coefficient does not change the relationship.
 
Ok, I see what you mean and this is obviously correct. However, I am not sure whether this is the answer to the OP's question. He is referring to the periodicity ##\Psi_{nk}(r)=\Psi_{n(k+G)}(r)## and what this does mean for the functions ##u_{kn}(r)##. The latter are given as
##u_{kn}=\sum_G a_{kn}(G)\exp(iGr)## for k in the first Brillouin zone. With the definition ##a_{k'n}=a_{kn}(G+K)exp(iKr)## for ##k'=k+K## the functions ##\Psi## become periodic in the sense of the OP.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K