Is a Core Temperature of 3.14*(10^7) K Feasible for a 50 Solar Mass Star?

AI Thread Summary
A core temperature of 3.14*(10^7) K for a 50 solar mass star is within a feasible range, as core temperatures for Main Sequence stars typically vary from 4 million to 40 million K. The core temperature of the sun is 1.5*(10^7) K, indicating that the proposed temperature is not significantly higher. The CNO cycle's reaction rate increases with temperature, suggesting that even a slight rise can greatly impact a star's energy output. Therefore, the calculation does not appear to be a major miscalculation. This temperature is plausible for such a massive star.
maggiemicmuc
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering how realistic it is for a 50 solar mass star to have a core temperature of 3.14*(10^7) K. This isn't much greater than the core temperature of the sun, which is 1.5*(10^7) K. Have I made some huge miscalculation, or does this seem feasible?

Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
maggiemicmuc said:
I'm wondering how realistic it is for a 50 solar mass star to have a core temperature of 3.14*(10^7) K. This isn't much greater than the core temperature of the sun, which is 1.5*(10^7) K. Have I made some huge miscalculation, or does this seem feasible?

Thanks.

Core temperature only varies by an order of magnitude in Main Sequence stars - roughly 4 million to 40 million K, from the smallest M to the biggest O star. Remember the reaction rate of the CNO cycle goes up ~(T)17 so only a small rise has a huge effect on a star's output.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top