Is a Euler or an Euler correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikeph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euler
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the correct article to use with the name "Euler." The consensus is that "an Euler" is appropriate due to the pronunciation resembling "oiler," which starts with a vowel sound. However, there is debate regarding the use of "a Euler" when referring to Euler as a person, as it implies singularity. When Euler is referenced in mathematical contexts, such as "an Euler constant," the article "an" is also suitable. The conversation humorously touches on common mispronunciations and includes playful references to other names and terms related to Euler, but the main focus remains on the grammatical rules surrounding the use of articles with proper nouns.
mikeph
Messages
1,229
Reaction score
18
Is "a Euler" or "an Euler" correct?

Given the pronunciation sounds like "oiler", which article do we use?

Couldn't find the grammar forum!:redface:
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Since "oiler" begins with a vowel, it's "an Euler". In days of old, children would have known that even before they learned what an Euler is, as you can see in this playground song:

What noise annoys an Euler?
Oh tell me, tell me do.
What noise annoys an Euler
And gets him in a stew?
Of all the noisy noises
Along the sea and coast,
I tell you boys, a noisy noise
Annoys an Euler most!

(Okay, it should be "oyster" and not "Euler", but the principle's the same.) :biggrin:
 


Euler is a name, and hence it is a proper noun. In this case, we do not say "an Euler" because Euler is a person. Saying "an --" implies that there are multiple cases, i.e. more than one Euler. However, if the name is attached to some mathematical object, then you can say "an Euler constant," because there may be multiple cases. The Euler in this case is treated as a simple noun.
 


marxLynx said:
Euler is a name, and hence it is a proper noun. In this case, we do not say "an Euler" because Euler is a person. Saying "an --" implies that there are multiple cases, i.e. more than one Euler. However, if the name is attached to some mathematical object, then you can say "an Euler constant," because there may be multiple cases. The Euler in this case is treated as a simple noun.

No, there are instances when one may wish to use the phrase "an Euler". For example, "When will we see another genius the likes of an Euler, a Newton, or an Einstein?" is perfectly good grammar.

And, as to the OP's question, it's "an" because the vowel sound used in the actual pronunciation is what matters in determining the indefinite article.
 


Unless you mispronounce Euler as many do. In that case, it's a Euler.
 


This sounds like an unique situation that deserves a honest answer.
 


Jimmy Snyder said:
Unless you mispronounce Euler as many do. In that case, it's a Euler.

Or conversely, the thing you put on the fire at Christmas is an Eul log.
 


AlephZero said:
Or conversely, the thing you put on the fire at Christmas is an Eul log.

Stop pouring Eul on the fire.
 


Wait. Are we talking about the mathematician Leonhard Euler, or his football player brother Houston Euler?
 
  • #10


Jimmy Snyder said:
Wait. Are we talking about the mathematician Leonhard Euler, or his football player brother Houston Euler?
Don't you mean Edmonton Euler, which is the only kind that counts?
 
  • #11


I had some deliciously Euley French fries the other day.
 
  • #12


So I guess it's a Euclid element.
 
Back
Top