Is a Firecracker Louder Than a Conversation at 100 Meters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter minidee
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the sound intensity of a firecracker at a distance of 100 meters, starting from its intensity of 140 dB at 1 meter. Participants discuss using the logarithmic decibel scale to determine the change in intensity as distance increases. The formula for converting intensity to decibels is highlighted, emphasizing the need to adjust for distance. The main question is whether the firecracker will be louder than a typical conversation at that distance. The conversation ultimately seeks assistance in applying the decibel formula correctly to find the answer.
minidee
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Can the Firecracker Be Heard?
Introduction: The decibel scale is logarithmic in intensity:

beta = 10log[I/I_0]
In this formula, I_0 is a reference intensity. To convert the intensity of sound waves from SI units to dB, I_0 is taken to be 10^{-12}W/m^2.

Once you know the intensity of a source in dB as measured at some reference distance, the intensity at a new distance can be found by subtracting the change in dB appropriate to the ratio of the new distance to the reference distance.

The change in dB corresponding to the change in distance may be found by replacing I_0 in the formula given here with the intensity at the reference distance and replacing I with the intensity at the new distance.

We apply the dB scale to a small firecracker that has an intensity of 140 dB at a distance of 1 m.


a.) The question asks: A child sets off the firecracker at a distance of 100 m from the family house. What is the sound intensity beta_100 at the house?
Express the sound intensity in decibels.


b.) Will the firecracker sound louder than the parents' conversation?

Please help! Quite lost!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got I_1 = 10^2. What to do next?!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top