Is a Goldstone boson identical to a Nambu-Goldstone boson?

  • Thread starter Thread starter meteor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boson
meteor
Messages
937
Reaction score
0
Hope some of the resident experts in particle physics can respond to it, because I'm unable to find a response to the question:
Is a Goldstone boson the same thing that a Nambu-Goldstone boson?
I suspect that is true because both particles are referred as massless, but I prefer the confirmation of some knowledgeable person
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind, I finally found that they are the same thing.
Curious fact: a majoron is a kind of Goldstone Boson
Goldstone bosons have spin 0.
 
Originally posted by meteor
Never mind, I finally found that they are the same thing.
Curious fact: a majoron is a kind of Goldstone Boson
Goldstone bosons have spin 0.

A majoron is a goldstone boson by construction since it comes from the spontaneous breaking of a symmmetry (as any goldstone boson).
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top