Is a Master's Degree Necessary for Advancing in Engineering?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a civil engineer in training (EIT) who feels stagnant in their career due to limited opportunities for hands-on design work and a perception of being behind more experienced colleagues. Despite having over two years of experience in transportation engineering, the individual is concerned about not advancing and is contemplating pursuing a master's degree to enhance their qualifications. Participants in the discussion emphasize that two years is not a long time in the field and suggest patience while continuing to show initiative and willingness to help others. They recommend discussing career aspirations during performance evaluations to seek more challenging tasks and constructive feedback. The consensus is that while a master's degree can provide valuable skills, demonstrated competence in current responsibilities is crucial for gaining more responsibilities at work. Overall, the advice encourages persistence, proactive engagement, and leveraging performance reviews to navigate career development.
langduca
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am a newbie in this website. I have found this website a great source of help for me in every possible ways. Currently I am at a crossroad in my career path where I need to make a sound decision in order to move forward.

I am a civil engineer in training (EIT) with more than 2 years of experience in the trasportation engineering field specilizing mainly in roadway/highway design. In my team, there are three other more senior level engineers who have masters and at least 6 years of experience. Working with them, sometime I feel I am so far behind them in terms of knowledge and software skills no matter how hard I try. I have never been shy away from asking questions and learning things on my own to improve my knowledge. However I still feel like they are still too far ahead for me to catch up. Plus, I always get assigned to do same tasks over and over again. So far I have not got many chances to do the designs under their supervision. Every time there is a design project coming in regardless of its complexity, they would do it and assign me small tasks in the design instead of letting me try to do the design myself under their supervision. I am just worried that if this keeps going on, then I will not be able to move forward in my career path. Is this normal for you guys when you first started working in the engineering field? I am considering of quitting my job and going back to school to get a master degree in transportation engineering. Would the master degree help me? Would experience weight more than a master? Please advice. Thank you very much for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two years may seem like a long time to you but your coworkers probably feel like you just got there. Be available to help out with anything. If your stuff gets slow ask what else you can do to help. If you're working in an office environment don't be the first to leave at the end of the day. Stick around and see who's working late, see if they need help. Sometimes the old guys think its quicker to do something themselves, rather than explain what needs to be done. But almost everyone appreciates it when the new guy is there to help, especially after hours. I did a lot of crappy stuff when I was new. Who else remembers "keypunch"? Haha. Don't worry, it gets better.
 
gmax has a good point - two years isn't very long. But I think you're right, it's enough time to start considering your options.

At your next performance evaluation, you should definitely discuss this topic with your boss. Let him/her know you are ready for more challenge. Hopefully, you will get constructive guidance that will help you decide on pursuing further education.

Do you have annual performance evaluations?
 
gmax137 said:
If you're working in an office environment don't be the first to leave at the end of the day. Stick around and see who's working late, see if they need help. Sometimes the old guys think its quicker to do something themselves, rather than explain what needs to be done. But almost everyone appreciates it when the new guy is there to help, especially after hours.

This is truly excellent advice. I am now one of the "old guys" and it is often true that doing something myself is faster than explaining it to a new hire and going through the iterations with them. But if it is clear that someone is really dedicated and investing their time and trying to be helpful, then it is certainly worth training them to help. Plus working hard and offering to help generates a lot of good will, and people are more likely to give an opportunity to that kind of employee.

Jason
 
lisab said:
gmax has a good point - two years isn't very long. But I think you're right, it's enough time to start considering your options.

At your next performance evaluation, you should definitely discuss this topic with your boss. Let him/her know you are ready for more challenge. Hopefully, you will get constructive guidance that will help you decide on pursuing further education.

Do you have annual performance evaluations?

Thanks for your advice. I do have annual performance evaluations. I brought this issue up with my boss during my mid-year performance review. He advised me to be patient and keep up my good works. I have always shown my willingess to learn and help others at work. Plus I am usually one of the last people who leave the office. Did you experience this before when you first started working? Do you think going to a grad school for a master's degree would help me fare better in my field? In other words, it would make me qualified to be given more responsiblities at work?
 
langduca said:
Thanks for your advice. I do have annual performance evaluations. I brought this issue up with my boss during my mid-year performance review. He advised me to be patient and keep up my good works. I have always shown my willingess to learn and help others at work. Plus I am usually one of the last people who leave the office. Did you experience this before when you first started working? Do you think going to a grad school for a master's degree would help me fare better in my field? In other words, it would make me qualified to be given more responsiblities at work?

The only thing that makes you qualified to be given more responsibilities at work is your demonstrated competence in successfully completing your current responsibilities. A focused master's degree could be very helpful for developing skills. I think of my graduate school program as "concentrated experience" because I had to do a lot of tasks myself that typically take years to work up to in industry.

You're showing a lot of initiative and eagerness to learn. I think you're probably doing just fine.
 
Hello, I graduated from undergrad a few years ago with a Major in Physics and minor in Electrical Engineering. I tried to get experience working on and testing circuits through my professor who studied Neutrinos, however covid caused the opportunity to go away and I graduated with no experience or internships. I have attempted to break into the engineering industry with no success. Right now I am considering going for a Masters in Electrical Engineering and I need advice on if this would be...
I don't know if anyone on here works for any of the well known defense companies of your country, whichever country you are from?? Also, if you choose to work in one, do you think the engineering education provide from your school would adequately prepare you for the job. What do I mean by that? Well if you work at say Lockheed Martin and you work in the latest iteration of a missile or if you work at Pratt & Whitney, they assign you to work in the team helping out with building the jet...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
433
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top