Is a New Members Forum Necessary on PF?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CrazyNinja
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the necessity of a "New Member Introductions" forum on PF. Participants question whether this forum effectively serves its intended purpose, noting that replies to introductions are infrequent and may not contribute meaningfully to the community. Concerns are raised about potential storage waste and cluttering the forum. Some suggest that existing threads could suffice for new members to engage without needing a separate introduction space. Overall, the consensus leans towards questioning the value of maintaining a dedicated introductions forum.
CrazyNinja
Messages
171
Reaction score
60
OK I am feeling giddly because this is my first thread on PF. Hope it generates enthusiastic debate.

The point is simple: Do we actually require "New Member Introductions" Forum? I have seen a couple of threads pop in the Unanswered Threads Forum ( which is absolutely wonderful by the way) and I've made sure I reply to them. I know it is encouraging when someone shows an interest in you when you introduce yourself, but the replies to these threads are very rare. Further more, they do not actually serve a scientific purpose ( fictional, non-fictional or otherwise) and could be a waste of storage space for PF servers ( OK I am just assuming this ).

In addition to this, we need to also think if they actually serve their purpose? Do we remember any of the people we have welcomed in New Member Introduction Forums? Are they really "introduced"?

Cheers
CN
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
Physics news on Phys.org
No requirement, plenty of space on PF servers, just a way for new members to get their feet wet and try posting a thread.
 
  • Like
Likes Ryan_m_b
I didn't know there was a members forum to start with. Why a new one then?
 
There already exists one @WWGD .

https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/new-member-introductions.240/
 
We can have a new member introduction thread instead and direct newbies automatically to that thread after they activate their profiles!
 
@Lisa! It will clutter space up and look less neat than it is now. Plus it won't serve the purpose Greg wants it to- "get the new guys to wet their feet". I was wondering why they can't jump into action slight away. The entire forum seems quite self explanatory.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
71
Views
6K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
10K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top