danielle36
- 29
- 0
I've heard a perpetual motion machine would be impossible, but then that some people out there believe it is. I was wondering if anyone out there has any thoughts on it..
The discussion centers on the impossibility of perpetual motion machines, as established by the laws of thermodynamics. Participants unanimously agree that while certain systems, like a rock spinning in space or electric currents in superconductors, can exhibit perpetual motion, they cannot perform work without energy loss. The term "perpetual motion machine" specifically refers to devices that are expected to do work, which is fundamentally unattainable. Claims of perpetual motion are dismissed as unscientific and lacking reproducibility.
PREREQUISITESPhysics students, engineers, inventors, and anyone interested in the principles of energy and motion will benefit from this discussion.
Perpetual motion and "free energy" discussions
Search PF and you will find many threads that have been closed in a number of forums. As for S&D, any claim of this nature would be reproducible and/or testable by the scientific community; hence there is no need for debate.