Is a Proton's Excited State Also Non-Adiabatic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter greisen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Excited State
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between a proton's excited state and non-adiabatic processes. An excited state of a proton, characterized by a higher energy level (E1), can indeed be considered non-adiabatic due to the significant energy transfer mechanisms involved. In NMR, non-adiabatic processes occur as the excited magnetic state interacts with the surrounding lattice, including solvent and analyte molecules. These interactions facilitate energy relaxation, highlighting the importance of non-adiabatic behavior in larger masses like protons. Understanding these concepts is crucial for comprehending proton transfer mechanisms in various applications.
greisen
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am reading about protons and their transfer mechanisms and often the words nonadiabatic and excited state are used in a way which confuses me.

If I have a proton in a higher vibrating state (E1) I would called that an excited state for the proton - is this also a non-adiabatic state for the proton?

Any help or advise appreciated.

Thanks in advance

Best
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think that for larger masses like the proton, non-adiabatic processes would be very important (relative to electronic excited states). In NMR, these non-adiabatic processes occur between the excited magnetic state of the proton and nearby (physically nearby) lattice. The relaxation of the excited state magnetizaton occurs through interaction with the solvent and other analyte molecules (the 'lattice') and through nearby (both physically and electronically) spin systems. These energy transfer mechanisms would be defined as non-adiabatic since they are intermolecular transfers of energy.

A good definition of 'non-adiabatic' and 'adiabatic' for excited state systems can be found here:

http://www.worldscibooks.com/phy_etextbook/4783/4783_chap1.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top