Is a Self-adjoint Operator Always Real?

  • Thread starter Thread starter daudaudaudau
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator
AI Thread Summary
A self-adjoint operator L satisfies the condition L = L^a, leading to the equation ⟨f, Lh⟩ = ⟨Lf, h⟩. In cases where the scalar product involves complex conjugation, the relationship ⟨f, Lf⟩ = ⟨Lf, f⟩* arises. This indicates that ⟨f, Lf⟩ equals its complex conjugate, confirming that it is a real number. The discussion highlights that self-adjoint operators correspond to real-valued observables in quantum mechanics. Therefore, it is established that self-adjoint operators yield real results.
daudaudaudau
Messages
297
Reaction score
0
Hello.

I have a linear operator, L, and its adjoint L^a. L is self-adjoint, so L=L^a. I'm being told that the following is true:

\langle f,Lh\rangle=\langle Lf,h\rangle.

But what if the scalar product is not the symmetric product? What if

\langle f,h\rangle=\langle h,f\rangle^*

where ^* is complex conjugation ? Then my first equation tells me that

\langle f,Lf\rangle=\langle Lf,f\rangle.

and the second one says that

\langle f,Lf\rangle=\langle Lf,f\rangle^*.

But which is true?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
daudaudaudau said:
But which is true?

Both, <f,Lf> is real.
 
But how do you know?
 
daudaudaudau said:
But how do you know?

You just showed that it equals its complex conjugate, <f,Lf> = <Lf,f>* = <f,Lf>*. So it is real.
Quite a standard result (eg, self adjoint operators represent real valued observables in quantum mechanics).
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top