Is a Symmetric and Transitive Relation Always Reflexive?

jeff1evesque
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
Statement:
Prove or Disprove: A relation ~ on a nonempty set A which is symmetric and transitive must also be reflexive.


Ideas:
If our relation ~ is transitive, then we know: a~b, and b~a \Rightarrow a~a.
Therefore our relation ~ is reflexive, since b~c and c~b \Rightarrow b~b, and c~a and a~c \Rightarrow c~c.


Proof:
Can the above (idea) constitute a proof in itself?

Thanks,

Jeffrey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually I thought about it a little, and came up with a proof. But can someone critique it and let me know if it's actually alright.


Proof
We know ~ is symmetric.
Therefore, \exists a,b,c \in A such that
if a~b, then b~a,
and if b~c, then c~b,
and if c~a, then a~c.​
But we also know our relation ~ is transitive.
Therefore,
if a~b, and b~a, then a~a, (#1)
and if b~c, and c~b, then b~b, (#2)
and if c~a, and a~c, then c~c. (#3)​
By (#1), (#2), and (#3) we know our given relation is reflexive.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top