Is Actuarial Mathematics a Challenging 400 Level Course?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NINHARDCOREFAN
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Annuity Mathematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the perceived difficulty of a 400-level course focused on insurance economics, risk models, survival distributions, life insurance, life annuities, and net premiums. Participants suggest that the course's difficulty can vary significantly based on the institution and the professor. They recommend obtaining the complete syllabus to assess the pace of topics and reviewing the textbook. Additionally, looking at old final exams can provide insight into the course's rigor. If uncertainty remains, consulting the professor about the course's challenges is advised. One participant notes that the professor in question is highly rated for teaching multiple courses, but student feedback on this specific course is scarce, indicating a potential challenge in gauging the professor's effectiveness.
NINHARDCOREFAN
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
The course is a 400 level course but when I look at the description of it, I'm thinking it should be easy. Am I wrong?

Course description: Topics include the economics of insurance, individual risk models for a short term, survival distributions and life tables, life insurance per year, life annuities, and net premiums.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you done any stats or finance papers?

http://www.actuarialoutpost.com/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can someone leave any remarks on this course?
 
It would totally depend on what school you're taking it at and who the professor is. The best thing to do is to get a copy of the complete syllabus and look carefully at the pace of topics covered, and take a look in the book to see what they are. Look at an old final exam copy if it's available. Then if you're still not sure, ask the professor about how challenging he/she intends to make the course.
 
Last edited:
0rthodontist said:
It would totally depend on what school you're taking it at and who the professor is. The best thing to do is to get a copy of the complete syllabus and look carefully at the pace of topics covered, and take a look in the book to see what they are. Look at an old final exam copy if it's available. Then if you're still not sure, ask the professor about how challenging he/she intends to make the course.

That's a good idea, I have the book and will look through it.

rad0786 said:
And find out who the prof is and go to www.ratemyprofessors.com and look at what other students say about him!

This professor teaches so many courses that it's not even funny and most people hate him. So, ratings relating to the course I'm looking for this proffesor is rare.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top