Is All Magnetic Field Really Zero According to Maxwell's Equations?

AI Thread Summary
Maxwell's equations indicate that the divergence of the magnetic field B is zero, leading to the conclusion that B can be expressed as the curl of another vector function A. This results in the application of Stokes' theorem, which suggests that the line integral of A around a closed path is also zero, implying that A is path independent. Consequently, it follows that A can be represented as the gradient of a scalar function ψ, leading to the conclusion that the magnetic field B must be zero. However, there is a concern regarding the application of Stokes' theorem in this context, as the region may not be simply connected. This raises questions about the validity of the proof and the assumptions made regarding the magnetic field.
typhoonss821
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
One of Maxwell's equations says that <br /> \nabla\cdot\vec{B}{=0}<br /> where B is any magnetic field.
Then using the divergence theore, we find
<br /> \int\int_S \vec{B}\cdot\hat{n}dS=\int\int\int_V \nabla\cdot\vec{B}dV=0<br />.

Because B has zero divergence, there must exist a vector function, say A, such that
<br /> \vec{B}=\nabla\times\vec{A}<br /> .
Combining these two equations, we get
<br /> \int\int_S \hat{n}\cdot\nabla\times\vec{A}dS=0<br /> .
Next we apply Stoke's theorem and the preceding result to find
<br /> \oint_C\vec{A}\cdot\hat{t}ds=\int\int_S\hat{n}\cdot\nabla\times\vec{A}dS=0<br /> .
Thus A is path independent. It follows that we can write
<br /> \vec{A}=\nabla\psi <br /> , where ψ is some scalar fution.

Since the curl of the gradient of a function is zero, we arrive at the remarkable fact that
<br /> \vec{B}=\nabla\times\nabla\psi=0<br />
that is, all magnetic field is zero!

Wow, there must be something wrong...

My thought is that we can not apply Stoke's theorem in this case because the region we discuss is not simply connected.

But I'm not sure if I am right, please help me check the proof^^
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The surface you use for the divergence theorem is a closed surface that encloses a volume. The surface is from the Stokes theorem is a surface that has the contour C as edge.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top