Is Average Velocity the Minimum and Possible Value Due to Its Proportion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Athikom 02
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the definition of "average velocity" in kinematics, emphasizing that it has a specific, established meaning that should not be altered. Participants express confusion over the idea of average velocity being described as a "minimum and possible value due to its proportion." Clarification is sought on this concept, but responses indicate that the phrasing lacks clarity and coherence. A practical example is suggested to illustrate that average velocity is not simply the arithmetic mean of two velocities. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of adhering to established definitions in scientific discussions.
Athikom 02
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Can we define "average velocity" as the possible and minimum velocity due to its proportion ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Athikom 02 said:
Can we define "average velocity" as the possible and minimum velocity due to its proportion ?

This makes no sense.

The term "average velocity" has a clear and unambiguous definition in basic kinematics. If you want to use the same term, you have to follow THAT definition, not make up some of your definition.

Zz.
 
Sorry to my mistake , actually i want to ask what if we say in different manner that average velocity is like the minimum and possible value due to its proportion.Am i understand it in right way ? (thanks and appreciate)
 
Athikom 02 said:
Sorry to my mistake , actually i want to ask what if we say in different manner that average velocity is like the minimum and possible value due to its proportion.Am i understand it in right way ? (thanks and appreciate)

"... average velocity is like the minimum and possible value due to its proportion... "

I have no idea what you just said here.

Assuming that you know what is the definition of an average velocity, see if you can convince yourself with whatever it is you are trying to ask for by trying this problem:

A vehicle travels the first half of its journey with a constant velocity v1. It then travels the
second half of the journey at a constant velocity v2. What is its average velocity for the
whole journey?

Hint: It is not (v1+v2)/2.

Zz.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top