Is baryonium fermion or meson?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BuckeyePhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fermion Meson
BuckeyePhysicist
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Is a baryonium baryon or meson?

For example, deutorium, a n-p bound-state, has total spin 0 pr 1, so it is boson, then, it is meson? But it has baryon number (3+3)/3=2.

For another example, bound-state of \Lambda_c - \bar{\Lambda_c}, has total spin 0 or 1, so again it is boson, it is meson? But it has baryon number (3-3)/3=0.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fermions are particles with half integer spins. Bosons are particles with integer spins.

Mesons are particles that are composed of a quark-antiquark bound state.
Baryons are composed of 3 quarks (anti-baryons are composed of 3 anti-quarks).

So... just because a particle is a boson does not automatically make it a baryon.

This is similar to an argument about geometric shapes. All squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares, there is an additional constraint on a square- all its sides must be the same length.

I hope this helps.
 
It is relevant. But it does not answer the question.
Thank you any way.
 
Deuterons are neither baryons nor mesons. They are made up of two baryons, each of which is made up of three quarks. As Norman mentioned mesons are made up of quark-antiquark pairs.
 
BuckeyePhysicist said:
Is a baryonium baryon or meson?

For example, deutorium, a n-p bound-state, has total spin 0 pr 1, so it is boson, then, it is meson? But it has baryon number (3+3)/3=2.

For another example, bound-state of \Lambda_c - \bar{\Lambda_c}, has total spin 0 or 1, so again it is boson, it is meson? But it has baryon number (3-3)/3=0.
d is not a meson.
Mesons have baron number zero.
L-Lbar is a boson and a meson.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top