Is bases the same as basis ? (Simplex Algorithm)

flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/3662/unledmcg.png



The Attempt at a Solution



I rewrote the whole thing in dictionary

x_3 = 15 - 8x_1 - 4x_2
x_4 = 7 - 2x_1 - 6x_2
z = 0 + 22x_1 - 12x_2

x_i \geq 0
1\leq i \leq 4



a) So my basis/bases is x = (x_3,x_4)

b) Do I have to solve the above using the Simplex Algorithm first?

c) I have to set x_1 or x_2 = 0 and the other one not 0.

So doing so I get (I chose x_1 and let x_2 = t)

x_3 = 15 - 4x_2
x_4 = 7 - 6x_2
z = -12x_2

So I get a line of

x = (0,t|15-t,7-6t)^t

So my answer is a line with t \in (-\infty, \frac{7}{6})

I have infinity in my interval...something does not feel right
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bases is the plural of basis. One basis, two bases. I have to go and do something else now, so I don't have time to help you with the actual problem, but I'm sure someone else will.
 
Fredrik said:
Bases is the plural of basis. One basis, two bases. I have to go and do something else now, so I don't have time to help you with the actual problem, but I'm sure someone else will.

How could there be more than one basis for any LOP?
 
I need to make a correction

When they mean bases, they just mean all combination of the basic variables.

I happen to have 4 variables and I could only only choose 2 slacks, so that's 6 combination namely

\beta = \left \{ 1,2 \right \}, \left \{ 1,3 \right \}, \left \{ 1,4 \right \}, \left \{ 2,3 \right \}, \left \{ 2,4 \right \}, \left \{ 3,4 \right \}
 
I just have one question, it's given that at least one basic solution HAS to be an optimal right? There can't be two optimal?
 
flyingpig said:
I just have one question, it's given that at least one basic solution HAS to be an optimal right? There can't be two optimal?

There may be multiple optimal solutions, but yes at least one (if the Weierstrass theorem is satisfied).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top