Is Bubble Fusion a Viable Method for Hydrogen-Hydrogen Fusion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jolb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bubble Fusion
AI Thread Summary
Rusi Taleyarkhan's claims of achieving hydrogen-hydrogen fusion through bubble cavitation and sonoluminescence have been discredited after he was found guilty of falsifying research, leading to the revocation of his funding. The discussion highlights skepticism about the validity of bubble fusion, with mixed evidence regarding neutron detection. Some argue that if bubble fusion were genuinely achievable, consistent evidence would emerge across experiments. The consensus emphasizes that universities do not make serious allegations of research misconduct lightly, suggesting strong evidence against Taleyarkhan. The conversation draws parallels to cold fusion, indicating that researchers may sometimes see what they want rather than maintaining objectivity. Overall, the integrity of scientific work is underscored, with a clear stance that those who falsify results forfeit their credibility in the scientific community.
Jolb
Messages
417
Reaction score
29
Rusi Taleyarkhan published many papers in pretty well-respected journals claiming that he was able to achieve hydrogen-hydrogen fusion using bubble cavitation/sonoluminescence. However he was found guilty of falsifying his research and got his funding revoked.

Has anyone with a background in fusion/nuclear physics been following this? What do you make of it? Was he just being completely dishonest or is there something to bubble fusion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jolb said:
Has anyone with a background in fusion/nuclear physics been following this? What do you make of it? Was he just being completely dishonest or is there something to bubble fusion?

I don't have a background in those areas, but from what I've read the evidence is inconclusive. You have some that claim they had neutron detection, and other than claim they didn't. If it really were possible I would expect the evidence to show up under most experiments.
 
"found guilty of falsifying his research" is pretty serious. Universities don't make statements like this without very, very, very strong evidence. They don't do this just because they think someone made a mistake.
 
I watched a show on bubble cavitation/sonoluminescence, Taleyarkhan was definiely onto an interesting phenomenon, but like cold-fusion, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion) people get inspired to find what they want to see rather than keeping an open mind. Anyone caught falsifying results loses the right to call their work scientific
http://www.sciencemag.org/site/feature/data/hottopics/bubble/index.xhtml
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top