I Is Consuming Wild Boar in Sweden Risky Due to High Radioactivity Levels?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sherwood Botsford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radioactivity
AI Thread Summary
Wild boar in Sweden are reported to have high levels of radioactivity, specifically Cesium 137, reaching about 18,000 bec/kg. The radiation exposure from consuming such meat can be significant, with calculations suggesting that eating one kilogram of this pork could yield a radiation dose comparable to a year’s normal exposure. However, only a fraction of the cesium ingested is absorbed by the body, and the actual dose may be lower when considering body mass and the body's ability to excrete some radiation. The high cesium levels in wild boar are attributed to their diet, particularly hypogaeic mushrooms. Overall, while there are risks associated with consuming wild boar, the actual absorbed dose may be less severe than initial calculations suggest.
Sherwood Botsford
Messages
91
Reaction score
22
Recent news story about wild boar in Sweden running about 18,000 bec/kg. I was trying to put this in perspective as to what the risk was for untamed porkchops.

This is a non trivial conversion. Please feel free to correct me:

The primary radiation source is Cesium 137 -- it's a gamma emitter, with a peak around 700 kev.

Radiation exposure in terms of effect is measured in Joules/kg.

1 J = 6.2 E+18 ev. = 6.2 E+15 kev

1 kg of pig = 18,000 emissions/second * 700 kev/event = 2 E-10 Watts.

About 30 million seconds in a year, so about .01 J per kg pig emitted in a year.

Cesium has a residence time in the body of 50 to 100 days. Call it .25 year.

So a 60 kg person eating a kg of pig will get 1/4 year * .01 J = 2.5 mSv or .25 rem.

A person gets about 1/3 of a rem per year So this kg of pig is ballpark a year's normal radiation dose.

Am I correct?

Is my methodology correct?

Note to moderators: This may be more appropriate to the biology subforum. Feel free to move it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that's too much. The point is that only a fraction of the cesium ingested will really be absorbed. As a rule of thumb 60.000 Bq of Cs-137 correspond to 1 mSv on ingestion.
Btw., the high activities found in boar is due to the diet of the boars, namely hypogaeic mushrooms of the genus Elaphomyces.
 
I addition to the fraction of cesium that is not absorbed: You divided the energy by 1 kg, basically assuming the whole body mass is replaced by the meat. Divide it by a more typical body mass of 80 kg (or 60 kg) and the dose goes down a lot. Some of the radiation will also leave the body, reducing the dose even further.
 
When I was an undergraduate (in Sweden) I took a short course in radiation safety (this must have been in 1998). The lecturer was a radiochemist who was also the radiation safety officer for the physics department.
When teaching us how to calculate the absorbed dose he mentioned that he once or twice a year would -illegally- buy moose meat which should have been destroyed (or rather buried) because of the Cs level being too high (>1500 bec/kg) directly from the hunters (at least back then all moose meat had to be tested before you could eat it).
He would then check the level himself and calculate how much he could safely eat
That way he was able to buy some very nice meat very cheaply:biggrin:

He was quite an interesting guy:rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and Drakkith
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top