Is CP Violation Evolving Over Time and Explaining Baryogenesis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dmitry67
  • Start date Start date
Dmitry67
Messages
2,564
Reaction score
1
Are there any new experiments/results regarding the subject? Like Kl, Ks, and other weird things?

I am interested in the subject mostly because CP voliation = T violation, and T violation for me is the deepest mystery.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CP=T if you believe TCP, whilch can be qjuestioned on the experimental level.
Why is "T violation for me is the deepest mystery" when almost everything you see is not time reversal invariant?
 
No, macroscopic T assymetry is not a mystery for me at all.
Just a consequence of the Initial conditions at the BB (low entropy)

microscopic T assymetry is much stranger.
I would be even not surprised if parameters of the standard model, responsible for T assymetry, would decrease gradually as more an more time is elapsed after BB

Is it possible that CP violation was bigger in early Universe? Would it help to explain the bariogenesis? I know that current CP violation is not enough for Sakharov mechanism.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top