Is Decoherence essentially a measurement? Then what?

rasp
Messages
117
Reaction score
3
2 basic questions from a non-physicist (sigh!). Is decoherence essentially a measurement? And if so is the system of quantum particles set into the classical world forever? Or is there a mechanism by which it will evolve again into a superimposed state? Secondly, if the particle (as in the 2 slit experiment) is essentially everywhere possible at a given time, then what sense can be given to assessing the probability that the particle can be found in a specific place?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clarification: 2 basic questions from a non-physicist (sigh!). Is decoherence essentially a measurement? And if so is the system of quantum particles that has experienced decoherence set into the classical world forever? Or is there a mechanism by which it will return into a superimposed state? Secondly, if the particle (as in the 2 slit experiment) is essentially everywhere possible at a given time, then what sense can be given to assessing the probability that the particle can be found in a specific place?
 
Decoherence is merely the entanglement of the quantum system with the quantum (assuming everything is quantum) environment. It remains in a pure, superposition, state, evolving according to the fundamental Schrodinger equation.
 
rasp said:
Is decoherence essentially a measurement?
Essentially, yes.

rasp said:
And if so is the system of quantum particles set into the classical world forever? Or is there a mechanism by which it will evolve again into a superimposed state?
The latter.

rasp said:
Secondly, if the particle (as in the 2 slit experiment) is essentially everywhere possible at a given time, then what sense can be given to assessing the probability that the particle can be found in a specific place?
It is not correct to say that the particle itself is everywhere. Instead, it is a non-vanishing probability of finding the particle which is everywhere.

For example, I don't know where do you live on Earth right now. Perhaps New York? Or London? Or a small village in India? I have no idea, so I can say that you can be "everywhere". But of course, I know that you are not at all those places at once. If I find you, I know I will find you at only one of those places.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top